Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Ask Umbra

Styro-Tome

On Styrofoam

By Umbra Fisk
06 Feb 2003
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
Got questions about the environment? Ask Umbra.
question Dear Umbra,

I continue to avoid buying Styrofoam, but I don't really know why. In middle school, I remember being told not to chew on Styrofoam cups because the action of breaking the Styrofoam would deplete the ozone and ingesting it would make me ill. This information, given to me by the lunchroom woman, is all I seem to have on the material. What is it with Styrofoam? Why should we avoid it?

Sincerely,

Sundee
Chicago, Ill.

answer Dearest Sundee,

I'm sure Lunch Room Woman is a wonderful person, but almost everything she told you was wrong. To begin with, there was no Styrofoam in your lunchroom. Styrofoam is the trademarked name of the Dow Chemical Company's exclusive blue extruded polystyrene insulation. Making Styrofoam involves putting polystyrene (a petroleum derivative) under tremendous pressure, resulting in very squished particles that are shaped into planks, last forever, and repel water, according to Dow.

takeout
This is not a Styrofoam container.
Lunch Room Woman made the very common mistake of conflating Styrofoam with Expanded Polystyrene. Expanded Polystyrene, known as EPS, is made by heating polystyrene particles, pouring them into molds, and injecting them with steam. Meat trays, coffee cups, picnic coolers, and their ilk are all made from EPS, never from Styrofoam. Being particular about saying EPS instead of Styrofoam may be one of those uphill battles, like saying "hook-and-loop fabric adhesive" instead of "Velcro" and "stacked potato wafers" instead of "Pringles." I have a loved one who tries to avoid using brand names such as "Kleenex" and "Xerox." It's a cute habit, but a time-consuming one.

Styrofoam became infamous back in the 1980s for the ozone-depleting CFCs used in its manufacture. Dow replaced CFCs with HCFCs, which are less ozone-depleting -- 93.5 percent less, according to the company. (However, they do contribute greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, fueling global warming: Out of the frying pan, into the fire.) Making EPS never involved CFCs or HCFCs, so your meat-tray-chewing habits have never jeopardized the atmosphere. Which leads us to the last correction: It is perfectly safe for you to eat as much EPS as you wish. The nice man at Poison Control assured me that it will neither harm you nor "cause blockage." However, it has no nutritional value. (Fits right into the cafeteria menu, no?)

EPS cup
The cup runneth over with EPS.
Should you avoid it? There is some debate in the environmental community about whether EPS is an ecologically good or bad product choice. Because it is derived from petroleum, it is not a renewable resource, and it is completely non-biodegradable. Industry advocates consider this a selling point, as EPS will not leach any nasty chemicals into landfill. Solid-waste experts are still unclear as to whether it is better to use products made from paper or EPS; if I uncover any decisive literature in the future, I'll let you know immediately.

Until then, carry on in a sensible manner, avoiding packaging and disposable containers of all sorts as much as possible.

Crunchily,
Umbra



Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Yours is to wonder why, hers is to answer (or try). Please send Umbra any nagging question pertaining to the environment -- but first check out her FAQs!
The claims made in this column may not reflect the views of this magazine. Neither the magazine nor the author guarantees that any advice contained in this column is wise or safe. Please use this column at your own risk.
Umbra Fisk is Grist Research Associate II, Hardcover and Periodicals Unit, floors 2B-4B.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: There are no comments. Be the first to post!

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
Green U., by Umbra Fisk. On student activism.
The Illumin-Naughty, by Umbra Fisk. On mercury in compact fluorescent lights.
Always a Big Turn-off, by Umbra Fisk. On turning off fluorescent lights.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks