Sen. Byron Dorgan says he wants to address climate change: “I think there is enough science out there to suggest something is going on.” But he opposes the cap-and-trade approach. “I’m in favor of taking action to reduce CO2 emissions and to protect our environment. But I don’t support the ‘cap-and-trade’ plan now being debated in the Congress,” he wrote in a recent editorial in The Bismarck Tribune.
He is critical of using a “market-based” approach to reducing carbon, and says he wants more “reasonable timelines” for reductions. He also argues that a majority of the revenue raised from a carbon cap should go to offset energy price increases for consumers.
Dorgan is particularly concerned about manipulation of a carbon market. “I’m not very interested with having a bunch of folks with a bunch of money get their mitts on trading credits, and have our future and our destiny tied to their interests,” he said in April. “I feel very strongly there’s something going on with our climate. We need to be attentive to it, we need to deal with it, but as we do, we have to be smart.”
He acknowledges that climate legislation is needed, but at a May event in North Dakota, he said it “may not be this year. May not even have the votes next year.”
Dorgan will want a climate bill to offer support for the coal and agriculture sectors. During debate on last year’s Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (which he voted to kill), Dorgan offered an amendment to increase funding for carbon-capture-and-sequestration (CCS) technology.
This year, during debate on the energy bill that the Energy and Natural Resources Committee passed in June, he again pressed for CCS funding. “We need a future in which we continue to use our most abundant resource, and that’s coal,” said Dorgan. He also called for more funding for loan guarantees for nuclear power and better plans for storage of nuclear waste. “I think nuclear power will play some role in the development of future energy capabilities,” he said.
At the same time, Dorgan is a cheerleader for wind energy, seeing as there’s plenty of it blowing across his state. He wanted a stronger renewable electricity standard in the energy bill, and plans to push for it on the Senate floor.
See also: Joseph Romm explains why he thinks Dorgan could be convinced to support climate legislation.
Do you know more about this senator’s stance on climate legislation? Tell us.
Find out about other senators by clicking on their names in the right column.
More stories in this series:
Kent Conrad Sen. Kent Conrad’s colleague in the House, Rep. Earl Pomeroy (D-N.D.), voted against the Waxman-Markey American Clean Energy and Security Act, and Conrad says he wouldn’t vote for the bill either. He also joined with three other moderate …
Mark Begich Sen. Mark Begich beat out everyone’s favorite Senate curmudgeon, “Uncle” Ted Stevens (R), in a tight race last fall. And while he’s seen as a modest improvement in the environmental realm, he’s also a steadfast supporter of increased …
Blanche Lincoln Sen. Blanche Lincoln recently called the House climate and energy bill “a complete non-starter,” and pledged that the Senate would move more slowly in crafting legislation in order to address the concerns of specific legislators and regions. Lincoln’s …
Claire McCaskillSen. Claire McCaskill doesn’t think the Waxman-Markey climate and energy bill that passed the House in June stands much chance of passing the Senate, and she would not support the bill as it stands. During House debate on the …
Get Grist in your inbox