Sen. Lindsey Graham has stepped up to become the leading Republican advocate of a bipartisan climate bill. In a New York Times op-ed on Oct. 11, Graham joined with Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) to put forward a framework for climate legislation that they say can pass Congress and become “the blueprint for a clean-energy future that will revitalize our economy, protect current jobs and create new ones, safeguard our national security and reduce pollution.”
Graham wants a climate bill that will:
- boost nuclear power by giving tax credits to the nuke industry, streamlining the permitting process for plants, and supporting R&D for nuclear-waste storage
- offer financial incentives for companies working on carbon-capture-and-sequestration technology, to help the U.S. become “the Saudi Arabia of clean coal”
- open more areas to oil and gas drilling, both onshore and off
- impose a border tax on goods coming from countries like China and India if those nations don’t adopt greenhouse-gas restrictions of their own
- establish “a floor and a ceiling for the cost of emission allowances,” to keep energy prices from rising too high
That’s certainly not the left-wing dream for a climate bill, but the right wing despises it nonetheless. Graham has taken quite a beating from right-wing activists for partnering with Kerry and even for believing that climate change is a real problem.
Graham has gotten lots of money from nuclear-power companies over the years, so it’s no surprise he’s pushing for legislation that would benefit the industry. Mainstream enviros don’t like Graham’s nuclear boosterism, but are hesitant to be too critical because he could help get the 60 votes needed to push a climate bill through the Senate. He’s already influenced Alaska Republican Lisa Murkowski, who recently said she might support a bill if it boosts nuclear power and oil drilling.
Despite his work toward a climate bill in the Senate, Graham is no fan of the House climate bill that passed in June. “What I’m trying to do is make sure that the Markey-Waxman bill from the House is dead,” he said at an Oct. 12 town-hall meeting in Greenville, S.C., where conservative activists were attacking him for his climate stance.
Do you know more about this senator’s stance on climate legislation? Tell us.
Find out about other senators by clicking on their names in the right column.
More stories in this series:
Kent Conrad Sen. Kent Conrad’s colleague in the House, Rep. Earl Pomeroy (D-N.D.), voted against the Waxman-Markey American Clean Energy and Security Act, and Conrad says he wouldn’t vote for the bill either. He also joined with three other moderate …
Mark Begich Sen. Mark Begich beat out everyone’s favorite Senate curmudgeon, “Uncle” Ted Stevens (R), in a tight race last fall. And while he’s seen as a modest improvement in the environmental realm, he’s also a steadfast supporter of increased …
Blanche Lincoln Sen. Blanche Lincoln recently called the House climate and energy bill “a complete non-starter,” and pledged that the Senate would move more slowly in crafting legislation in order to address the concerns of specific legislators and regions. Lincoln’s …
Claire McCaskillSen. Claire McCaskill doesn’t think the Waxman-Markey climate and energy bill that passed the House in June stands much chance of passing the Senate, and she would not support the bill as it stands. During House debate on the …
Get Grist in your inbox