
No myth has done more to lull Americans into complacency or allow bad actors to fight off good policy.
The American people are deeply attached to the notion that any problem can be solved with a new doohickey. It would, after all, relieve them of the terrible responsibility of saving the world. (Surely a clever scientist in a lab somewhere will invent a Climate Stabilizer and we can all stop worrying about this nonsense!)
The powers that be in the energy world are deeply invested in persuading legislators that the technology just isn’t ready yet — that’s why it’s premature to start mandating emission reductions. This is what the perpetually-ten-years-away “clean coal” is all about. More research!
It’s not hard to see the appeal of a techno-fix. The alternative to whizbang new technology is a list of thousands of changes in regulation, legislation, behavior, and thinking, each one demanding the country’s collective attention, wits, and wherewithal. It can seem overwhelming.
But a) fundamental breakthroughs in energy technology are extraordinarily rare, b) we don’t have time to wait for them, and c) nothing spurs learning like doing. The best way to figure out better techniques and technologies is to start deploying the hell out of what’s already here.

Myth: There is a “free market” in energy
Myth: Pricing carbon will destroy the economy
Myth: Tackling climate change requires fundamental technological breakthroughs
Myth: Using less energy = sacrifice
Myth: Solving climate change is primarily about finding cleaner sources of energy
Myth: Europe’s experience shows that cap-and-trade can’t work
Myth: Consensus on policy is possible even among those who disagree about climate change
Myth: Unlike cap-and-trade, a carbon tax is simple, immune to manipulation, & politically palatable
Myth: Climate policy must be simple
Myth: Waxman-Markey gives away 85 percent of allowances to polluters