A favorite rhetorical tactic of global warming skeptics is to point out that climate scientists use models, which they imply are less scientific than the hard data used by other disciplines. This is, on its face, dumb. Every scientific field uses data to develop models, uses models to predict future data, and where there are discrepancies modifies either the data collection methods the models (or both). Climate science does the same. There are, however, interesting and unique features of climate models, and the indispensable RealClimate offers a quick synopsis thereof. It’s slightly technical, but good reading nonetheless.
Get Grist in Your Inbox
David Roberts is a staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.
Why it’s a big deal that half of the Great Lakes are still covered in ice
NFL player tackles sustainable beef off the field
Why you should be skeptical of Walmart’s cheap organic food
El Niño could raise meteorological hell this year
The brutally dishonest attacks on Showtime’s landmark climate series