An analysis of judicial rulings by the Environmental Law Institute shows that judges appointed by Democrats are markedly more likely than judges appointed by Republicans to rule in favor of plaintiffs who sue the feds for violating certain environmental regulations — and the disparity is even more striking when the focus is on judges appointed by President Bush.Says Patti Goldman of Earthjustice, “It makes you realize that it really, really matters who appoints the judges.” Read the court talk in Muckraker — today on the Grist Magazine website.
Get Grist in Your Inbox
David Roberts is a staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.
The secret life of Rust Belt beekeepers
Here’s how the media is getting the story on cities & millennials wrong
Wanna know what’s happened to the Gulf Coast since the BP spill? Read this blog, now
Insane cycling video will make you hold your breath for two minutes
Why you should be skeptical of Walmart’s cheap organic food