An analysis of judicial rulings by the Environmental Law Institute shows that judges appointed by Democrats are markedly more likely than judges appointed by Republicans to rule in favor of plaintiffs who sue the feds for violating certain environmental regulations — and the disparity is even more striking when the focus is on judges appointed by President Bush.Says Patti Goldman of Earthjustice, “It makes you realize that it really, really matters who appoints the judges.” Read the court talk in Muckraker — today on the Grist Magazine website.
Get Grist in Your Inbox
David Roberts is a staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.
Insane cycling video will make you hold your breath for two minutes
Why it’s a big deal that half of the Great Lakes are still covered in ice
NFL player tackles sustainable beef off the field
Why you should be skeptical of Walmart’s cheap organic food
The brutally dishonest attacks on Showtime’s landmark climate series