An analysis of judicial rulings by the Environmental Law Institute shows that judges appointed by Democrats are markedly more likely than judges appointed by Republicans to rule in favor of plaintiffs who sue the feds for violating certain environmental regulations — and the disparity is even more striking when the focus is on judges appointed by President Bush.Says Patti Goldman of Earthjustice, “It makes you realize that it really, really matters who appoints the judges.” Read the court talk in Muckraker — today on the Grist Magazine website.
Get Grist in Your Inbox
David Roberts is a staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.
Millions alive today would have to die before the paleo diet could take over
Washington state just lopped up to $2,500 off the cost of solar panels. Here’s how.
Goodbye, everyone! A massive hole has opened at the End of the World
Lay off the almond milk, you ignorant hipsters
Nestlé doesn’t want you to know how much water it’s bottling from the California desert