I’m in the midst of writing an op-ed about Wal-Mart’s green transformation. One theme that comes up frequently in the commentary is this: Wal-Mart is "only" doing these things because they’ll improve the bottom line.
Um … yeah.
It’s a business. It’s supposed to make money. As a publicly held corporation, it’s required by law to make money. If it went around doing things that deliberately reduced its profits, it would be subject to a shareholder lawsuit.
The whole point of the green business trend is that green makes business sense. Reducing waste is good management. What kind of bizarre message does it send if a business sees the light on this issue only to be told that they get no credit because their motivations are financial?
Sometimes I’m just not sure what greens expect.
Get Grist in your inbox