Contrary to conventional wisdom, environmental regulation often creates jobs.Image: truthout.orgWhat's good for job growth, good for the environment, and good for public health? No, it's not a trick question, but it is a reassessment of what passes for conventional wisdom in Washington, D.C., these days. The answer is the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and other enormously popular environmental regulations enacted in the 1960s, '70s, and '80s with strong bipartisan support. Let's start with the conventional wisdom. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) recently called for the repeal of 10 "job-destroying" regulations, calling them "costly bureaucratic handcuffs that …
Get Grist in Your Inbox
Elizabeth A. Stanton
Elizabeth A. Stanton is a senior economist with the Stockholm Environment Institute-U.S. Center, and is a member of the Climate Task Force of Economics for Equity and the Environment, a project of Ecotrust.
Don’t believe anything you read at Natural News
Amory Lovins’ high-tech home skimps on energy but not on comfort
This little fox loves transit. Should we tell him he just missed his stop?
Plants are poison — and that just may be why they keep us healthy
Millions alive today would have to die before the paleo diet could take over