Skip to content Skip to site navigation

Climate & Energy

Comments

Um, If It’s Not Too Much Trouble?

EPA suggests wishy-washy compromise in Indiana BP permit mess Officials from the U.S. EPA have stepped in to quell the furor over a controversial permit the state of Indiana granted to a BP refinery. The permit will allow BP to discharge more ammonia and sludge into Lake Michigan -- at legal limits, but increased over previous amounts. Residents and politicians in Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and nationwide are up in arms over the decision: several city councils have passed resolutions opposing it, as has the U.S. House of Representatives; at least one Chicago alderman is calling for a BP boycott; and …

Read more: Climate & Energy

Comments

Idle oughts

We still heart Rocky Anderson

Rocky Anderson is in the news again, reminding us why we all love him. Now he's taking on idling autos, calling for city-owned vehicles and personal vehicles on city business to limit their idling to five minutes, except in emergency situations. Fifty percent of air pollution in Utah comes from cars and trucks, and Rocky wants the city to do their part in cutting down on the smog-creating emissions. His environmental adviser, Jordan Gates, says this latest executive order is part of the mayor's comprehensive plan to improve air quality, encourage alternative fuels, reduce driving, bolster alternative transportation, and reduce …

Comments

Global warming and empty calories

High CO2 crops could be low on nutrition

One of the silver linings of climate change, some have argued, is that high carbon dioxide levels will mean increased crop yields, which will, in turn, be good for combating global hunger (the logic, I suppose, being that if we're frying fifty years from now, at least we won't be hot and hungry). But some underpublicized studies, reported this month in Nature, cast a long shadow on this sunny assertion. (Sorry! It looks like the the article is subscription only, so I'll be as descriptive as possible.) In the 1980s, Bruce Kimball, a soil physicist with the USDA in Arizona, …

Read more: Climate & Energy, Food

Comments

Hanford, we have a problem

A leak, to be precise.

The following is a guest post from Natalie Troyer, publications and volunteer coordinator at Heart of America Northwest. Read her previous posts here and here. I don't know if you've heard, but on Friday, July 27, a geyser from Hades erupted at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Yep, it's true. In the wee hours of that morning, a water line became clogged with radioactive sludge as thick as peanut butter, sending a big chunky mass of the hottest, most deadly material found on the site spattering to the ground and contaminating the air. Approximately 50 to 100 gallons of the toxic …

Read more: Climate & Energy

Comments

New consensus?

At the New York Sun, Gary Shapiro notices that there's broad bipartisan consensus on the need for "energy independence" but very little agreement about how to achieve it. Uh, hasn't that been the prevailing situation for almost a half century now?

Comments

'We got the fever, oh we got the fever ... '

Luckily

A must-read interview on global climate change with William H. Calvin.

Read more: Climate & Energy

Comments

Climate change and conflict: a 'myth'?

Not really

I get the point Idean Salehyan is trying to make in "The New Myth About Climate Change," but -- the headline should tip you off -- the whole piece has been unnecessarily tarted up to generate controversy. It administers a stern beating to a series of strawmen. The "myth" in question is that global warming increases the probability of conflict, or as Salehyan puts it, "international and civil wars, a rise in the number of failed states, terrorism, crime, and a stampede of migration toward developed countries." What the piece demonstrates, however, is that the claim is a myth only …

Comments

Where there's a will, there's a way; where there's a Samuelson, there's a whine

We have what we need to beat global warming

One of the consequences of lazy, defeatist mainstream discussion of climate change (see: Robert J. Samuelson) is goofballery like this piece in The New York Times. Michael Fitzgerald argues that because we don't yet have a weapon that can totally and awesomely kick global warming's ass, we should spend billions of public dollars on giganto-technologies like carbon sequestration and space-age masturbation aids like light-reflecting space particles. This is stupid. We have dozens, hundreds of ways of cutting GHG emissions available right now. We have technological tools; we have social, economic, legislative, and regulatory tools. I'd bet we could get the …

Read more: Climate & Energy

Comments

Buoys

Wave power takes its first baby steps. Instantly, whinging descends from all sides.

Read more: Climate & Energy

Comments

The World Bank and global warming

An attempt at censorship by Wolfowitz

Sad, but perhaps not surprising. "Wolfowitz attempted to censor World Bank report on global warming," from Greenwire ($ub req'd): Former World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz attempted to shift the organization's focus away from climate change during his tenure, according to documents made public through the Government Accountability Project yesterday. Wolfowitz's behavior is indicative of a political climate at the bank that was not receptive to discussing the threat posed by global warming, the documents show. A Wolfowitz deputy attempted to tone down climate references in one of the bank's main environmental strategy papers, the bank's chief scientist, Robert Watson, said …