Skip to content Skip to site navigation

Climate & Energy

Comments

Watch

The Energy Star Alliance is running a public service announcement profiling a fictional family powering their house with static electricity. It's a pretty funny commercial; I wish I knew the ad firm that did it.

Read more: Climate & Energy

Comments

Eh, why bother

Of course not. That would release CO2, and we'd have to buy an offset or plant a tree or something. I jest, of course. The reason this comes up is a flaming debate going on right now. Over on the weather channel blog, Heidi Cullen asks: If a meteorologist can't speak to the fundamental science of climate change, then maybe the AMS shouldn't give them a Seal of Approval. (FYI: AMS is the American Meteorological Society.) Marc Morano, the high-strung Inhofe staffer, responded on the EPW blog: Broadcast meteorologists (TV weatherman) skeptical of climate alarmism have -- up until now …

Read more: Climate & Energy

Comments

They Grow Up So Fast

Corporations join green groups to push for U.S. climate action Quivering under the bed was an option, but 10 major corporations have bravely formed a coalition with four U.S. green groups instead, calling for a national limit on carbon emissions. Their aim is a 10 to 30 percent cut over the next 15 years, using a cap-and-trade system that would allow over-emitters to buy credits from those who fall under the cap. The United States Climate Action Partnership, which wins today's kinda-clever acronym award, includes heavy-hitters like GE, BP, Alcoa, and Duke Energy. Such companies are motivated by fears of …

Comments

A Speechwriter Behind Every Bush

Content of State of the Union speech remains a mystery -- kind of Will President Bush crack down on climate change in his State of the Union address? The world may never know -- until, of course, he gives the speech next Tuesday. Mutterings that the administration would embrace a cap-and-trade carbon-reduction scheme were flatly denied by White House spokesflack Tony Snow this week: "If you're talking about enforceable carbon caps, in terms of industry-wide and nationwide, we knocked that down. That's not something we're talking about." Bush's stubbornness is unpopular with, um, nearly everyone. European Commission President José Manuel …

Comments

Gloom and Doom With a Sense of Doomed-er

Doomsday Clock ticks to 11:55 p.m., thanks in part to climate change Cue ominous music: We're edging closer to annihilation, according to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists' famed Doomsday Clock -- a symbolic measurement of how close civilization stands to ultra-mega-doom, or "midnight." Yesterday, the group pushed its famed ticker two minutes forward to 11:55 p.m., adding climate change to its traditionally nuke-based calculations for the first time. "When we think about what technologies besides nuclear weapons could produce such devastation to the planet, we quickly came to carbon-emitting technologies," says Executive Director Kennette Benedict. The clock has been adjusted …

Read more: Climate & Energy

Comments

Enviros delighted with House Democrats’ energy bill

"I can't find anything wrong with it. Really, there is no catch. It's all good." Is the sun setting on some oil industry tax breaks? Photo: iStockphoto Let the record show that these contented words were spoken by an environmentalist -- Jim Presswood, a top lobbyist for the Natural Resources Defense Council to be exact. He's talking about the CLEAN Energy Act of 2007, introduced on Friday, which would repeal billions in tax breaks for the oil and gas industry and steer the resulting funds toward energy efficiency and renewable energy. It's jarring to hear such a positive assessment from …

Comments

An account of one scientist’s testimony

On Friday, I participated in a briefing on Capitol Hill on the use of science in policy debates. Other panelists were Don Kennedy, editor-in-chief of Science magazine, Juliet Eilperin, environment reporter for the Washington Post, and David Goldston, formerly chief of staff of the House Science Committee and now a lecturer at Princeton. In my presentation, I made two points that will not surprise long-time readers. First, I argued that the scientific assessment process is the best way to determine what the scientific community thinks about a particular scientific issue. The key to my argument is that credible scientific advice …

Comments

There are some good ones

DR: Let's talk legal issues. I can see the analogy between cigarettes causing lung cancer and burning oil causing asthma. You have a reasonably distinct causal chain. You can reasonably point to knowledge on the part of the oil companies. But when it comes to global warming, you have a long and tenuous causal chain, and ambiguous knowledge on the part of the bad actors. It's a kind of second-order externality. Do you think these global warming suits against, say, car companies are winnable? And if they are, don't you then open up half the industries in the country to …

Read more: Climate & Energy

Comments

Catch up post: replying to some comments

As promised, this is a catch-up post, wherein I belatedly reply to various comments. Ron Steenblik, director of research for Global Subsidies Initiative, said: "Long distance transmission lines are good because they reduce the need for storage or backup if we use variable sources to generate electricity. (Storage is good, but transmission is almost always cheaper.)" Gar, may I make the friendly suggestion that you qualify that statement. I can recall back in the 1970s when there was a lot of public resistance to new transmission lines, and with good reason: they can be unsightly. Also, for developing countries that …

Read more: Climate & Energy

Comments

Everything Goes Better With Barack

Obama joins McCain, Lieberman to push Senate climate bill If you follow politics, the phrase "McCain-Lieberman" might make you throw up in your mouth just a little. Since 2003, U.S. Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) have worked to pass a bill that would cut greenhouse-gas emissions, to no avail. But wrap your tongue around this: McCain-Lieberman-Obama. Has a nice ring, doesn't it? The grizzled senators are hoping the endorsement of rock star Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) will help them pass this year's version, which would impose mandatory caps on emissions and lead to a two-thirds reduction of …