Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

Everything Old, and Nukes Again

Bush talks up nukes, ethanol, and technology at renewable-energy meeting

Posted at 6:58 AM on 06 Mar 2008

President Bush addressed a renewable-energy conference in Washington, D.C., Wednesday, repeating earlier declarations that the United States is dependent on oil and that investment in technology will solve the country's energy problems. "[W]e've got to reduce our dependence on oil and fossil fuels, and replace them with alternative energy sources to power our homes and our work places," he said. Bush called nuclear power "safe" and "limitless" and praised massive loan guarantees to the nuclear industry as well as legislation shielding new nuke plants from lawsuits. He also briefly mentioned ethanol's contribution to rising food prices, but said that investing in biofuels research "is the best thing to do" to address the problem. Bush praised select provisions in the 2007 energy bill that raised fuel-economy standards and ethanol targets, but left out the part where he pressured Congress to drop the renewable-electricity standard and renewable-energy tax credits from the bill. "I hope when history is written of this administration, we not only talked, we actually did positive things and constructive things." Well, keep hoping.

source:  Transcript of Bush's speech
see also, in Gristmill:  Bush's renewable-energy sleight of hand

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (10 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Before there was Gore...


The year: 2003.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/02/20030206- ...

In his State of the Union address, President Bush announced a $1.2 billion hydrogen fuel initiative to reverse America's growing dependence on foreign oil by developing the technology for commercially viable hydrogen-powered fuel cells to power cars, trucks, homes and businesses with no pollution or greenhouse gases. The hydrogen fuel initiative will include $720 million in new funding over the next five years to develop the technologies and infrastructure to produce, store, and distribute hydrogen for use in fuel cell vehicles and electricity generation. Combined with the FreedomCAR (Cooperative Automotive Research) initiative, President Bush is proposing a total of $1.7 billion over the next five years to develop hydrogen-powered fuel cells, hydrogen infrastructure and advanced automotive technologies.


The Year...2008


http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/03/20080305- ...

In December, President Bush signed the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007, which responded to his "Twenty in Ten" challenge in last year's State of the Union Address to improve vehicle fuel economy and increase alternative fuels.  

The Renewable Fuels Mandate will increase the use of renewable fuels by 500 percent - requiring fuel producers to supply at least 36 billion gallons of renewable fuel in the year 2022.



Bush Funds Ethanol


http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/03/20080305- ...

Since 2001, ethanol production has quadrupled from 1.6 billion gallons in 2000 to an estimated 6.4 billion gallons in 2007, with the vast majority coming from corn.  In 2005, the United States became the world's leading ethanol producer, and last year, the U.S. accounted for nearly half of worldwide ethanol production.

The Administration is also investing in next generation biofuels such as cellulosic ethanol.  This can be made from wood chips, switch grass, and other agriculture products.  With the President's 2009 Budget, the Department of Energy has dedicated about $1 billion since 2001 to develop technologies that can make cellulosic ethanol cost-competitive.  Since the President took office, the projected cost of cellulosic ethanol has dropped by more than 60 percent.  

Last year, the U.S. produced about 450 million gallons of biodiesel - up 80 percent from 2006.  Today, there are more that 650 biodiesel fueling stations, and hundreds of fleet operators use biodiesel to fuel their trucks.  Every year, more Americans are realizing the benefits of biodiesel, which can produce fuel from soybeans and other vegetable oils, including waste products like recycled cooking grease.  

Over the last five years, the U.S. Government has invested about $1.2 billion in hydrogen research and development to help bring hydrogen fuel cell vehicles to market.  These vehicles use no gasoline at all, and emit clean, pure water.  



Just wondering . . .

If nuclear energy was so safe, why do the new facilities need to be shielded from future lawsuits?

Less is more..

I believe in nuclear proliferation.  Every auto should use its own fuel pellets. Just imagine - drive a million miles between refuels; completely recyclable. And collisions will take on a whole new meaning!  And in the end, just pass the pellets on to the next generation..
  But seriously - all this high-minded stuff is pie-in-the-sky talk.  Making hydrogen from solar locally would be fine; maybe zeolite storage (an environmentally friendly medium)& either fuel-cells or IC engines would be OK - but do we need to go that far out on a tech limb?  Perhaps it will be part of the mix, but the Bush way would look more like Nuclear/Coal feedstock Hydrogen.  Clean, but with dirty roots.  Roots rooted in big wonderful firms like Haliburton.. And who could ever forget energy giants like ENRON (AKA - Bush's biggie contributors) - that's why independent producers makes sense, and real regulations on the industry.
  What's always missing is the efficiency component.  Maybe because there's not enough money to be made in it??  Gee, perhaps it just makes too much sense.  Pedal to the metal, and onward we go..  No lobbying organization for efficiency, so the way the Gov't. works today as a kick-back machine, it's no wonder things are messed up!  They tend to leave out all the gazillions in incentives to anything but renewables as well - it doesn't make as good a press..
  The old axiom holds true:  You get the Government that's paid for by the highest bidder.  We need to bring citizens back into play, and eliminate the role of giant corporations in the Government, lest we loose what few freedoms remain, and botch our own future.  This has a lot to do with the outcomes in energy and the economy - worth the while to see who's funding whom for office, and start choosing representative of we, the people.
 

Because the oil and gas lobby has so much money

If nuclear energy was so safe, why do the new facilities need to be shielded from future lawsuits?

Because the oil and gas lobby, especially the oil and gas tax revenue lobby, has so much money.

Not that that's news to you.

How shall the car gain nuclear cachet?

Nuclear for all! says Bush

My favorite part of Bush's speech was when he told all the ministers there from developing nations that THEY should develop their nuclear technologies and the US would support them. If nuclear is a bad idea in the USA, it is a HORRIBLE idea in Nigeria...

Nuke lobby is pretty rich too...

Because the oil and gas lobby, especially the oil and gas tax revenue lobby, has so much money.

It ain't exactly like the nuclear lobby is gutter-poor either, though.  They're obviously paid well enough that they managed to get the plants protection from lawsuits in the first place, didn't they?

The Nuclear Lobby

Nukes actually get more R&D dollars than fossil fuels and renewables combined.

Certainly not gutter-poor indeed.

-David Ahlport

Current State Of Nukes In U.S.

I just attended a brief seminar on uranium mining.  There are currently many applications for exploratory drilling in the U.S., mainly from companies in Canada.  Many applications are in the Grand Canyon, outside the Park boundaries.  Meanwhile, the radioactive waste from this mining, known as tailings, is still piled high in the open air, surrounded by fences (we saw pictures of this ludicrous situation).

The main people harmed by uranium mining are Native Americans, so of course no one ever mentions mining when they talk about nuclear power because only white people count in this country, and even then only if they have enough money.

Nuclear anything is very environmentally destructive just due to the mining of uranium, to say nothing of the radioactivity nuclear projects emit and the permanent radioactive waste they create.  Technology alone will not adequately reduce or eliminate environmental or ecological harms caused by consumption of artificial energy.  A significant reduction in demand coupled with better technology, like local solar and wind, will do that.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks