Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

Metro Effectual

City residents emit less CO2, study says

Posted at 6:58 AM on 29 May 2008

Residents of the 100 largest metropolitan areas in the United States emit less carbon dioxide pollution per capita than the U.S. average, according to a new study. The Brookings Institution analyzed data on household and transportation energy use and found that the average U.S. resident was responsible for about 2.87 tons of carbon pollution a year, but that residents of the U.S.'s 100 largest metro areas had footprints of just 2.47 tons a year on average. Among the 100 largest cities, Honolulu residents were responsible for the least per capita emissions: about 1.5 tons per person per year. Lexington, Ky., fared the worst among the ranked cities with about 3.81 tons of CO2 per person per year. Overall, West Coast cities fared better than Eastern ones due to warmer climates, more aggressive energy-reduction policies, higher fuel and electricity costs, and a greater reliance on hydropower. To lower everyone's footprint, the study authors recommended increasing funding for mass transit and clean-energy R&D, and passing federal legislation to put a price on carbon emissions.

sources:  Associated Press, The Mercury News, The New York Times

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (3 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Makes sense...

...less commute time, more likely to take mass transit, more likely to have a car (compared to a big truck), smaller living spaces, etc.

Shifting Blame


Yes, but city dwellers are also responsible for denser infrastructure.

Example:  Are you actually taking the carbon foot prints of all the buses and subways and adding it to the personal foot print?

Are you adding in the cost of skyscrapers and vertical rise buildings?  The energy costs?  

What about bringing goods into the city via restricted transit ways like bridges and tunnels?

To me a city dweller is like a laptop computer...yes, it's "light" but it's only usable if you carry around a ton of accessories.

The Town vs. Country Breakdown

To get a full - and funny - breakdown of the urban vs. suburban carbon lifestyle, check out this video!

http://video.titantv.com/content/000B0007/video.aspx

Versus!  

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks