|
|
||
Thursday, 07 Jun 2007
We're Sorry, AngelaG8 participants report climate-agreement highs and lowsWe can't possibly do justice to the intricacies of this week's G8 summit in this space. So brace for some injustice: German Chancellor Angela Merkel wants the G8 to agree to cut greenhouse-gas emissions 50 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. U.S. President George Bush doesn't dig that plan, and wants to involve China and India in a vaguely defined "long-term solution." Bush and Merkel met yesterday, after which media around the world reported that her climate hopes were dashed. "There are a few areas here and there we will continue to work on," she said. Today, a glimmer of hope surfaced after Bush met with Tony Blair. The outgoing British prime minister emerged from that chat saying he hoped the G8 would agree to cuts "on the order of" 50 percent -- without, you know, using any actual numbers. Said Bush: "We are deadly earnest about getting something done. The U.S. will be actively involved if not taking the lead in a post-Kyoto framework." The G8 will issue a final climate communique tomorrow.
Clean Water Is Highly OverratedBush administration limits reach of Clean Water ActIf you assumed the federal Clean Water Act should apply to all bodies of water in the U.S., well, you have made an ass out of u and me. The Bush administration unveiled guidelines this week that say only bodies of water large enough to float a commercial boat in and their adjacent wetlands will get automatic protection under the law, while decisions on smaller streams will be made on a case-by-case basis. The new rules attempt to provide guidance in the wake of a Supreme Court decision that found justices split on whether to limit the act. "In effect, the EPA and the [Army Corps of Engineers] are taking their field staff and the public out to the woods, blindfolding them, spinning them in circles, telling them to 'go west,' and calling that guidance," says Jon Devine of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Democrats in Congress have introduced legislation that would clarify and again widen the scope of the law. But why have clear guidance when you could have arbitrary decision-making?
get the backstory in Grist: Supremes divided on wetlands protection
The Whine of the MotorBig Auto pleads for smaller gains in fuel efficiencyThe heads of Ford, GM, and Chrysler returned to Washington, D.C., yesterday to try to convince Congress not to hike fuel economy standards. Next week, the Senate will consider a proposal to raise average fleet-wide mileage to 35 miles per gallon by 2020 from the current 25; several bills have sprung up to float more modest increases. At least two, including one cosponsored by Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.), contain escape clauses for car companies if the new standards prove too difficult to achieve. While the industry acknowledges that some increase in efficiency is due -- mileage requirements for cars have not changed since 1983 -- GM CEO Rick Wagoner said the current proposals "don't look achievable." There's that American can-do spirit! Faced with the usual litany of industry concerns, including health-care costs and trade woes, reps were less than receptive. "I think the issue is over," said Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.). "I think you've lost that issue. I think your position is yesterday forever." |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
Glade Runners, 06 Jun 2007
One Step Backward, Two Steps Back, 05 Jun 2007
Sounds Familiar, 04 Jun 2007
|
|