From Tesco to Burger King to IKEA, the horse-meat saga has gripped the western world for the past month. Horse hasn't even made it into stateside meaty meals, but you wouldn't know it from our outsize horror at the idea of chowing down on lovable ponies.
As someone who hasn't eaten animals in a really long time, I've been kind of confused about all this. Why the moral panic about this four-legged mammal and not all the other ones that end up in sandwiches? This isn't a modest proposal -- I'm genuinely trying to understand.
"The unfolding drama around Europe's horse-meat scandal is a case study in food politics and the politics of cultural identity," Marion Nestle wrote at Food Politics. "They (other people) eat horse meat. We don't. Most Americans say they won't eat horse meat, are appalled by the very idea, and oppose raising horses for food, selling their meat, and slaughtering horses for any reason."
Raising horses for meat was re-legalized in the U.S. in late 2011, against the wishes of the Humane Society, which argued that horses shouldn't be eaten because they're considered "companions." But since then, no horse slaughterhouses have actually managed to open their doors in the U.S.; one would-be horse-meat purveyor recently sued the government for moving too slowly on inspections.
As Cord Jefferson points out at Gawker in a post entitled "You should eat horse," horse meat is cheaper than beef, comparable in terms of calories and protein, and has way more omega-3 fatty acids. But he notes that there's some legit cause for concern: