Cross-posted from Policy Innovations.
As human numbers approach 7 billion, the question is, “Where do we go from here?”
The U.N. recently published new population projections, which envision a range of possibilities for the 21st century. In the U.N.’s low projection, our numbers peak at 8 billion by mid-century, then decline to 6 billion by 2100. By contrast, the medium and high projections envision continued growth for the foreseeable future. According to the medium projection, the world’s population would reach 10 billion by 2100; according to the high projection, nearly 16 billion.
Now, I don’t believe there is an optimal size for the human population; greater equity and more efficient use of resources would greatly extend the planet’s “carrying capacity.” Yet, when you consider the resource challenges of the 21st century, 8 billion certainly looks more sustainable than 16 billion.
Take water, for example. While there is no global shortage of water, a growing number of regions are chronically parched. And many of those regions are also where population is growing most rapidly. In the world’s most “water poor” countries, population is expected to double by 2050. Slower growth is not a panacea for the world’s water problems, but it could ease pressure on scarce resources and buy time to craft solutions.
The good news is that we know how to slow population growth. Over the last half century, we’ve learned that the best way to slow growth is not through coercive “population control,” but by ensuring that all people are able to make real choices about childbearing.
Women’s rights are key. Fertility rates remain high where women’s status is low. Fewer than one-fifth of the world’s countries will account for nearly all of the world’s population growth this century. Not coincidentally, those countries — the least developed nations in sub-Saharan Africa, south Asia, and elsewhere — are also where girls are less likely to attend school, where child marriage is common, and where women lack basic rights.

Read more on population. Check out our series 7 Billion: What to expect when you're expanding
That can change. Nations can raise women’s status by educating girls, by enforcing laws that prohibit child marriage, and by improving women’s access to credit, land, training, and jobs. Where women enjoy these fundamental rights, smaller (and healthier) families become the norm.
At the same time, women need the means to make choices: family planning and other reproductive health services. Around the world, some 215 million want to avoid pregnancy, but aren’t using effective methods of contraception. Fulfilling that “unmet need” for family planning would require an additional $3.6 billion [PDF] annually; the U.S. share of the cost (based on a formula developed by the U.N. Population Fund) is about $1 billion [PDF].
And the potential benefits are huge: Improved access to family planning could prevent 53 million unintended pregnancies, 150,000 maternal deaths, and 25 million abortions each year.
Women’s rights and reproductive health are vitally important in their own right, as a matter of public health and social justice. They can also help slow population growth and help ensure a sustainable future.
Read more in this vein from Laurie Mazur and more on women’s rights and population.

The numbers behind the numbers: Meet your 7 billion neighbors
What you don’t know about women, climate change, and population [VIDEO]
7 billion in 7 minutes: Science magazine explains it all [VIDEO]
I am the population problem
Will my baby be the 7 billionth?
Come and get your Endangered Species Condoms
Population math explained: Growth rate is down, total is up [VIDEO]
Women, population, and the age of the ‘Black Swan’
Women’s rights are key to slowing population growth
How environmental and women’s groups can work together
International family planning saves lives. So why is the GOP cutting it?
Where’s the contraceptive for overconsumption? [VIDEO]
Will more attention to climate change bring back ‘population control’?
7 billion? It's time to talk
We can feed 10 billion of us, study finds — but it won’t be easy
An indigenous take on family planning and population
Remember when Americans used to care about population? [VIDEO]
Talking to my son about sex and sustainability
Are Americans more worried about population than climate change?
What if population grows faster than the experts project?
Who you gonna call? GrowthBusters! [VIDEO]
7 billion, unpacked — a comic
Stop the ‘man swarm,’ save the wild world
Is the environmental crisis caused by the 7 billion or the 1%?
Three’s a crowd: Is it unethical to have more than two kids?
Live chat on population 7 billion — ask your questions and have your say-so
Climate change is our biggest challenge, says McKibben — but we need to keep working on population
How to feed 7 billion of us without ruining the planet