What’s your worry?Elisabeth Rosenthal’s big piece on climate change in the Sunday New York Times — “Where Did Global Warming Go?” — has been discussed by bloggers and dismantled by Joe Romm. But in that flurry of MSM explication, one interesting tidbit from the story was missed:
When the British polling firm Ipsos Mori asked Americans this past summer to list their three most pressing environmental worries, “global warming/climate change” garnered only 27 percent, behind even “overpopulation.”
Rosenthal’s phrasing is telling — a critical environmental issue is generating even less concern than population!? — but not surprising. What is surprising is that 29 percent of American respondents actually listed “overpopulation” as a major environmental problem. Population was a hot topic in the ’60s and ’70s, but hasn’t been on the radar even of many self-proclaimed enviros since then.
The Ipsos MORI poll asked, “What are the three most important environmental issues facing your country today?” and offered 15 options to choose from. Among Americans, overpopulation was the fourth most popular answer, and climate change was fifth.
What ranked higher? This is depressing: “Dealing with the amount of waste we generate” came in above both climate and population, with 41 percent naming it as one of our top three challenges. People, listen up: A perceived shortage of landfill space is not on par with the utter climate chaos we can already see unfolding around the globe, or the need to feed and provide a decent quality of life to a population poised to increase by more than 2 billion people over the next 40 years.
Americans’ top two green concerns, each named by 50 percent of respondents, were “future energy sources and supplies” and “depletion of natural resources.” A generous interpretation might be that voicing concern about energy sources is another way of voicing concern about climate change; a non-generous interpretation would be that Americans just don’t like the specter of running out of stuff.
But hey, at least climate and population were in the top five in the U.S. and “over-packaging of consumer goods” was not — which is more than Poland can say.


The numbers behind the numbers: Meet your 7 billion neighbors
What you don’t know about women, climate change, and population [VIDEO]
7 billion in 7 minutes: Science magazine explains it all [VIDEO]
I am the population problem
Will my baby be the 7 billionth?
Come and get your Endangered Species Condoms
Population math explained: Growth rate is down, total is up [VIDEO]
Women, population, and the age of the ‘Black Swan’
Women’s rights are key to slowing population growth
How environmental and women’s groups can work together
International family planning saves lives. So why is the GOP cutting it?
Where’s the contraceptive for overconsumption? [VIDEO]
Will more attention to climate change bring back ‘population control’?
7 billion? It's time to talk
We can feed 10 billion of us, study finds — but it won’t be easy
An indigenous take on family planning and population
Remember when Americans used to care about population? [VIDEO]
Talking to my son about sex and sustainability
Are Americans more worried about population than climate change?
What if population grows faster than the experts project?
Who you gonna call? GrowthBusters! [VIDEO]
7 billion, unpacked — a comic
Stop the ‘man swarm,’ save the wild world
Is the environmental crisis caused by the 7 billion or the 1%?
Three’s a crowd: Is it unethical to have more than two kids?
Live chat on population 7 billion — ask your questions and have your say-so
Climate change is our biggest challenge, says McKibben — but we need to keep working on population
How to feed 7 billion of us without ruining the planet