Uncategorized

But he still understates the case

Al Gore's denials about a possible presidential run are getting more and more equivocal. Today, paleocon Pat Buchanan argues that Gore could beat Hillary to secure the Dem nomination and possibly the presidency.

If anything, I think he understates the case, particularly in two places. Here's the first, most relevant for our purposes:

A public service announcement

Today is my birthday, so feel free to use this thread to tell me just how empty your life was until you met me and/or encountered Gristmill.

It means less than you might think

Chevron's discovery of massive new oil deposits beneath the Gulf of Mexico has prompted a predictable flood of stupidity from the media. The theory of peak oil is being called into question. Our need to get off of oil is being called into question. The quality of our national dialogue is being called into question.

For one-stop shopping on what the new oil find means -- and doesn't mean -- see this definitive post over on Oil Drum.

Some tasty debunking

I was pleased and surprised to see that Consumer Reports devoted the cover story of its recent issue to a lengthy report debunking the alleged benefits of E85. This is part of a welcome new focus on green issues by the magazine.

Enviros should adopt some animal welfare concerns

Many environmentalists strongly advocate sticking with a platform that focuses exclusively on the large global challenges of biodiversity preservation and natural-resource sustainability, and stays clear of animal welfare. They correctly point out that environmentalism has traditionally concerned itself not with the treatment of individual animals, but with protecting whole populations. At a time when we face mass species extinctions, it is certainly a risky strategy to contemplate the expansion of environmentalism into a realm fraught with both ideological and political difficulties.

But I believe this is what environmentalism should do.

CEO of nation’s largest auto dealer gets behind the latter

"Who Killed the Electric Car?" conspiracies aside, why do I think plug-in hybrids will make it where strict plug-ins didn't?

Because, at a gut level, I think more people would buy them. Americans are congenital dreamers. No matter that most trips are under 25 miles. If the car purchase in question does not let you indulge in the fantasy that one day you might just take that road-trip to Jazzfest, wheels hissing on the wet moon-lit roads through the bayou, air heavy with frangipangi and Spanish moss; or a surfari to Baja, camping in the dunes and eating nothing but the fish you spear -- well, what's the point?

An electric car with a 200-mile range may get your groceries, but at the cost of cherished self-image. Practicality and reality have never been much of a driving force in purchasing decisions.

Just my opinion, which doesn't matter much in the scheme of things. But here's an opinion that matters a bit more: check out this op-ed from from the CEO of AutoNation, the nation's largest car dealer:

An interview

An interesting interview with James Lovelock, though his defense of nuclear power is maddeningly sketchy. I'd like to see the original transcript.

Advocate for eating horse needs to go

In a sane universe, if someone singlehandedly tried selling off America's national parks -- our collective inheritance -- they would be arrested.

In this world, we have to settle for voting them out of office.

So, if you were planning on getting involved in helping defeat Richard Pombo, chair of the House Resources Committee, big jerk, anti-ESA zealot, and single largest advocate of eating more horse and whale meat*, now would be a good time.

Not only is time growing short, but if you act now you can listen to a song and get a free CD, too.

* Short list.

Can we stabilize atmospheric CO2 at safe levels?

As you probably know by now, the cover story of The Economist is on global warming, unimaginatively titled "The heat is on."

I commend you to the extraordinarily good op-ed that kicks off the package:

Republican candidate will be forced to testify in environmental lawsuit

As a native of the great not-too-bad state of Tennessee, I'm somewhat ambivalent about the Senate race there, which is enormously important to both parties and, at least at the moment, a dead heat.

The Dem, Harold Ford, is something of an empty suit, considerably more interested in his own greater glory than in policy or governance. His R opponent, Bob Corker, is by all accounts a moderate technocrat who's been extremely effective as mayor of Chattanooga, a city that has transformed itself over the last few decades from an industrial backwater to a thriving, liveable urban center with one of the nation's best affordable-housing programs and nicest waterfront parks. (See Q&A with Chattanooga urban planner Karen Hundt here.)