When I read this bit of George Will’s recent column —

The 1930s paradigm [of poverty] has been refuted by four decades of experience. The new paradigm is of behavior-driven poverty that results from individuals’ nonmaterial deficits. It results from a scarcity of certain habits and mores — punctuality, hygiene, industriousness, deferral of gratification, etc. — that are not developed in disorganized homes.

Your support powers solutions-focused climate reporting — keeping it free for everyone. All donations DOUBLED for a limited time. Give now in under 45 seconds.
Secure · Tax deductible · Takes 45 Seconds

Stories like this don’t tell themselves.

Make others like it possible. Your support powers solutions-focused climate reporting — keeping it free for everyone. Give now in under 45 seconds.
Secure · Tax deductible · Takes 45 Seconds

— I had to choke back a little vomit. And then I started composing an appropriately caustic, dismissive post in my head.

As Kevin Drum too-gently points out, the notion that the poor are poor because they’re lazy and shiftless is hardly a new paradigm. It’s very, very old.

To support our nonprofit environmental journalism, please consider disabling your ad-blocker to allow ads on Grist. Here's How

But rather than heaping scorn on Will’s head, I just refer you to Ezra Klein’s substantive dismantling of the claim — and, while you’re at it, Klein’s longer piece on poverty.