Latest Articles

It’s not driven by demand

Whaling nations have amassed a blubber mountain, despite desperate measures like mixing the stuff into dog food. It is the principle, apparently, that counts.

Bottom line: it's not demand for whale meat driving whaling, but politics, stubbornness, and claims of cultural rights.

New report cites impacts of biodiversity loss

For those of you that would rather get a root canal the read "Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services," consider this your Cliff's Notes.

This new report in Science shows that marine biodiversity loss is increasingly impairing the ocean's ability to provide food, maintain water quality, and recover from perturbations. If these trends continue, pretty much all the fish will be gone by 2048. In fact, according to the report, a whopping 30% of the world's commercial fisheries are already collapsed.

Food retailer boosts salaries of top executives

Success breeds imitation breeds competition, and Whole Foods is feeling the heat: its stock dropped more than 20 percent on news of slowing sales.

Said CEO John Mackey on his blog:

There has been an explosion in interest from our supermarket competitors in virtually everything we are doing, from copying many aspects in the design of our stores to selling more organic foods of all types, other supermarkets are studying and emulating us in dozens of different ways in their attempt to compete more aggressively against us.

‘It’s cold today in Wagga Wagga’–Weather and climate are different

(Part of the How to Talk to a Global Warming Skeptic guide)

Objection: It was way colder than normal today in Wagga Wagga, proof that there is no global warming.

Does this even deserve an answer? If we must ...

Second annual climate-action day tomorrow, Nov. 4

Tomorrow: international day of action on climate change!

Following up on last year's event, building on the growing restlessness of the populace, and looking toward next week's meetings in Nairobi, ClimateUSA wants you to get out on the streets and make some noise. Way more fun than cleaning the bathroom, don't you think?

Readers talk back about property rights, extraneous vehicles, toxic schools, and more

  Re: Give and Takings Dear Editor: I’m glad you took up the story of the extreme private-property initiatives put on Western states’ ballots, but was taken aback by the tenor of the story. I rely on Grist for news that understands the environmental impact of policies, but this story seemed to swallow almost whole […]

Business Week article gave some the wrong impression, company says

Stonyfield Farm, purveyor of organic yogurt and milk, is concerned that some folks got the wrong idea about its business strategy from a recent Business Week article about the big-ification of organic, which I pointed to a couple of weeks ago.

Tom Gray on green touring, Wal-Mart, and why he won’t proselytize

Gomez: (l to r) Ben Ottewell, Ian Ball, Olly Peacock, Paul Blackburn, Tom Gray. Photo: Kevin Westenberg Tom Gray isn’t sure where the stuffed monkeys came from. He just knows that at the moment, they’re in the way. Moving them to one side, he offers me a seat on the cushioned bench at the front […]

Regulatory takings initiatives tie communities’ hands

I love sewers. I love them because the alternative is so much worse. Ponder that for a moment.

What the heck do sewers have to do with property rights and regulatory takings? Patience, grasshopper.

As I wrote yesterday, a rash of so-called "property rights" ballot measures in the West are threatening the very basics of community planning and environmental protection. Arizonans are facing Prop 207; Californians are battling Prop 90; Idahoans are up against Prop 2; and Washingtonians are facing Initiative 933. (Montanans and Nevadans recently dodged a bullet when their initiatives were invalidated because of little things like fraud and constitutional violations. More on that in a later installment.)

By design, all the 2006 property ballot measures deploy the same scheme: "pay or waive." That is, you can pay a property owner to obey the law, or you can waive the law.

A small price to pay

Seems like more and more people -- even conservative economists -- are going on record in support of higher gas taxes.

From an economist's point of view, it's a bit of a no brainer. Like just about any addiction, our gasoline habit carries lots of "externalities" -- costs that fall on everyone rather than just the person who uses the gas. (Think climate change, oil spills, air pollution, security vulnerabilities, international military entanglements, economic risk from oil price shocks, etc.)

If we consumers had to pay those costs every time we filled our tanks, we'd use gas a little more sparingly -- and we'd create fewer externalities as a result. Plus, the taxes could provide a source of revenue to deal with the problems created by energy consumption -- say, a dedicated funding source for ramping up efficiency.

But that begs the question -- just how high should the taxes be?