Articles by Sarah K. Burkhalter

A green gift-giving guide for all the folks on your holiday list

Are you the type who puts off holiday shopping until the last minute, makes a guilt-ridden and miserable foray to the mega-mall, and comes home with bags full of junk that nobody wants? Well, this year, turn over a new bough. We’ve got suggestions of eco-gewgaws for everyone on your list. The Trendy Clotheshorse Eco […]

A refresher on the basics of climate conferences and Kyoto

Later this month, a mess of world leaders will be gathering in Montreal to discuss climate change. The conference is a rendezvous — we must use French words when speaking of Quebec — of COP 11 and MOP 1. And it has to do with the Kyoto Protocol! Isn’t that mysterious and intriguing? One of […]

UCS presents interactive animation about auto lobbyists and fuel economy

From Umbra's heartthrob, the Union of Concerned Scientists, a funny little interactive animated thingamajig making a point about the sway auto lobbyists hold over fuel-economy standards. It compares potential mpg, air pollution, and gas prices. And at the end there are hairy men in a hot tub. Does it get any better than that?

My two cents: I'm in the camp that high gas prices are a good thing, because then people presumably don't drive as much, which is less wearing on the environment than even the most eco-friendly vehicle. Obviously. But I don't currently have a car. If I did, I'm sure that concern for my pocketbook would bring me down off my high-and-mighty hill.

Side note: Isn't "pocketbook" a bit outdated? Who has a pocketbook anymore?

Roman Catholic church in the UK teaches that Bible can be factually inaccurate

Here's an interesting development, from the U.K. Times Online:

The hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church [in England, Scotland, and Wales] has published a teaching document instructing the faithful that some parts of the Bible are not actually true.

This includes the first 11 chapters of Genesis, wherein the earth and humankind are created in six days. It's a rebuttal to strict creationism.

Sometimes I have a sneaking suspicion that this is still news to some people: There are lots of different Christians, and they believe lots of different things. So in a sense, the publication of this teaching document doesn't really mean anything -- I'm pretty sure we're all going to keep on believing what we're believing. But it seems significant to me, and potentially to the environmental community, since, as the article points out, the Church has historically condemned those who don't take the Bible as the literal word of God.

Anyway, I just thought that was interesting (as did Matthew Wheeland at Alternet, who beat me to the punch.)