It seems that a day doesn’t slip by without someone raising the stakes in the alternative-energy poker game.

The most recent bombshell wager: Cambridge Energy Research Associates report that alternative energy investments will — hold on to your hats! — top $7 trillion by 2030. That’s an audacious number by any measure, and normally it would be enough to suck the oxygen right out of a convention of wind-farm enthusiasts. But that’s not the half of it. The most startling aspect of the report is that it barely raised a ripple in the investment community.

And why should it?

There’s been a steady drum beat of wild-eyed clean-tech forecasts for more than a year now. What’s one more trillion-dollar log on the fire?

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

But CERA is no pump-and-dump stock scam operating out of an abandoned warehouse in Jersey. It’s a respected global advisory group made up of serious economists and energy analysts and headed up by Daniel Yergin, a recognized energy expert and Pulitzer Prize-winning author.

Unfortunately, the report doesn’t appear to break any new ground with its forecast — it mentions that alternative energy is fast approaching mainstream application, that continued advancements in technology could rapidly speed both deployment and acceptance of clean tech, and that nuclear energy will play a large role in low-emissions power.

But it does add a bookend — albeit an incomprehensible one — to the debate about the direction and pace of the alternative energy sector by attaching a dollar amount to the size of the potential investment market.

By and large, much of the financial reporting on the alternative energy market has followed a similar pattern, focusing on investments by venture capital firms in green-tech startups, the green investing revolution, the inevitable collapse of the alternative energy bubble, or the dubious benefits of ethanol.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Few folk have been brave or foolish enough to venture a guess on the future girth of the alternative energy market. It’s hard enough just to get a reasonable estimate of current investments, let alone to project out 20-plus years down the road. If reports are to be relied upon, 2007 was the high-water mark for investments in the alternative energy market in the U.S. and Europe. Last year, investors poured $5.8 billion into the industry, according to one report by the Cleantech Group. New Energy Finance, a London-based research firm, estimated $117 billion was invested worldwide by companies and governments in 2007.

Normally, I’d describe the difference between $5.8 billion and $117 billion as a yawning gap, but compared to the spread between $117 billion and $7 trillion, it’s a mere rounding error. Maybe the market and investors were wise to ignore the announcement.