Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

The Lotion in the Ocean

Sunscreen-slathered swimmers contributing to coral bleaching, says study

Posted at 1:37 PM on 13 Feb 2008

Photo: iStockphoto
Photo: iStockphoto
Up to 6,000 tons of sunscreen wash off of ocean swimmers each year, posing a threat to up to 10 percent of global coral reefs, according to a new study in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. Four common sunscreen chemicals can awaken dormant viruses in coral-dwelling algae, with results of horror-movie proportions: the viruses replicate to the point that the algae explode, spilling the viruses into surrounding seawater and infecting neighboring coral populations. The algae, called zooxanthellae, provide coral with food energy and contribute to reefs' bright colors; without zooxanthellae, the coral bleach and die. So burn, baby, burn -- or, better yet, seek out a nontoxic sun lotion.

source:  National Geographic News
see also, in Grist:  Coral reefs suffer from proximity to humans, says study
see also, in Grist:  A reef-protection crusader answers questions

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (5 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The prophetic words of Garrett Hardin-

"you can't do just one thing"... or was it Barry Commoner?...  

This is hard to believe.

What is 6,000 tons of sunscreen divided by all the water in the seven oceans? Is that ppm calculation even detectable?

Stay positive, love your life.
Non-Toxic Sunscreen?

I don't know that there is a non-toxic sunscreen.  A company called Badger from Vermont(?) makes a sunscreen that Environmental Working Group rates No. 1 for least health hazard and best protection.  http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/browse.php?sunscreens=1& ...

However, even this sunscreen contains micronized zinc oxide, which is persistent and bioaccumulative in wildlife, seems to have broad systemic effects at moderate doses, and may be ecotoxic.

A better idea would be to slowly get used to the sun and tan naturally, eschewing sunscreen altogether.

Just wear a t-shirt...

...do it all the time when I snorkel.

In response to Kevin

It's not a question of diluting the sunscreen across the oceans, which I agree would a ridiculously small number.

Contrary to popular belief, oceans do not circulate quickly, nor do pollutants instantly disperse.

So, if swimmers are playing near corals, they will receive a higher dose due to proximity.

I have to wonder, though, if this is because of misapplication of sunscreen. Shouldn't swimmers wait 10-20 minutes to allow the stuff to absorb into the skin before getting into the water anyway?

If you continue to do what you've always done you'll continue to get what you've always got. - Yogi Berra

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks