The Mobility Choice Coalition — a collection of environmentalists, fiscal conservatives, and national security specialists — ranks the most effective ways to reduce transportation-oil dependence in a new report, Taking the Wheel: Achieving a Competitive Transportation Sector Through Mobility Choice.

graphImage: Mobility Choices

They must have forgotten to include “tax cuts for the $250,000-plus income bracket.”

Grist relies on the support of generous readers like you. Donate today to keep our climate news free.

The key phrase in the title is “technically achievable oil savings.” The report doesn’t wade into whether the best strategies — a gas tax and congestion pricing — are politically feasible.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

More from Tanya Snyder at Streetsblog:

Unlike many similar reports, the Mobility Choice study doesn’t put emissions reductions front and center. They’re more interested in fiscal restraint and national security — well-timed considerations for our current political climate.

I was surprised to see “Liberalize local land-development rules” so far down the list. Nearly everywhere in the U.S., outdated zoning laws mandate things like lot setbacks, building-height limits, parking space minimums, and 14-feet-wide road lanes — whether or not they really make sense for a location. The authors clarify that compact, mixed-use development takes longer to create oil savings — and their report focuses on benefits in the next 10 to 20 years.

That said, our building stock is rebuilt more quickly than you might assume. By 2035, approximately three-quarters of the built environment will be either new or renovated, according to Architecture 2030.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.