A final bit of superb reporting from Paul D. Thacker at Environmental Science & Technology before he heads to a new job.

It’s about conflicts of interest in the science publishing world:

Reader support helps sustain our work. Donate today to keep our climate news free.

As environmental journals publish more controversial papers on topics such as human health and global warming, they are beginning to face a serious issue that medical journals have long been dealing with — conflict of interest. Although disclosure policies are standard in the medical community, publishers of environmental research have been slow to adopt such guidelines.

There are some truly eye-opening case studies in the piece. It’s a little unsettling that the scientific process is as much subject to big-money gaming as politics. Perhaps science is becoming a continuation of politics by other means. Or is it the other way around?

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

This one is a must-read.