A while back I mentioned a great article by Diane Farsetta about the nuclear industry’s big PR push and the gullibility of the journalists covering it. Now there’s a similar piece in the San Francisco Bay Guardian, from Amanda Witherell, and it contains this delightful tidbit:

A survey by Diane Farsetta, a senior researcher at the Center for Media and Democracy, came across 302 recent articles mentioning [Patrick] Moore and nuclear power as a possible option for mitigating the effects of global warming.

Reader support helps sustain our work. Donate today to keep our climate news free.

Only 37 — a mere 12 percent — said he’s being paid to support nuclear power by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), a national organization of pro-nuke industries that’s hired Moore to front its nuclear renaissance.

Worth reading the rest.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Relatedly, check out this story about David Fenton of Fenton Communications, a progressive PR firm that’s mobilizing to push back against the onslaught of nuke shillery.