Skip to content
Grist home
Grist home
Grist home

Uncategorized

All Stories

  • Bush’s new line on global warming

    As global warming becomes a more and more salient political issue (thanks, Al!), Bush gets asked about it more often, and is forced to defend his (lack of) policy. Predictably, he's saying some pretty stupid things.

    Consider this, from an interview with People:

    Do you think Gore is right on global warming?
    I think we have a problem on global warming. I think there is a debate about whether it's caused by mankind or whether it's caused naturally, but it's a worthy debate. It's a debate, actually, that I'm in the process of solving by advancing new technologies, burning coal cleanly in electric plants, or promoting hydrogen-powered automobiles, or advancing ethanol as an alternative to gasoline.

    First, no, there's not a debate. And if there were ... how does one "solve" a debate? And if it were epistemologically possible to "solve" a debate, how would you do it with a series of subsidies to industry?

    Anyhoo. Here he is on Larry King Live last night:

  • Atlantic @ Aspen

    Via Ezra, I stumbled on the Atlantic @ Aspen blog, a chronicle of Atlantic staffers' attendance at this year's Aspen Ideas Festival, "a 'summer university' featuring discussions, seminars, and tutorials with some the most provocative thinkers, writers, artists, businesspeople, and leaders from around the world."

    Three posts jumped out.

  • Sigh

    Can you guess who said this?

  • Watch out for those rising seas

    Read recently that scientists now think dodos (you remember them) went extinct not at the hands of humans, but because of a natural disaster. Specifically, because of cyclones or rising sea levels.

    Those dodos just sat there as sea levels rose? Didn't do anything? Went extinct? Ridiculous.

  • Bulldozers in South Central

    If you're up for it, go here to see some stomach-churning video of bulldozers taking down the South Central Community Farm, and L.A. police manhandling underage protestors.

  • C’est Fin

    Sushi popularity means bad news for tuna, WWF warns The popularity of sushi is sending tuna stocks into a downward spiral, says the World Wildlife Fund, warning that Mediterranean and eastern Atlantic bluefin tuna will go extinct if commercial fishers continue hooking them at current rates. “The fishery is running out of control,” WWF says […]

  • Place Invaders

    A warming Antarctica is threatened by invasive species As more tourists and researchers head to Antarctica — gotta see that ice before it’s gone! — scientists are worrying about a different sort of invasion: flora and fauna. “The more individuals of an alien species or nonnative species get there, the more likely something will be […]

  • Candid Cameron

    Tories and Labor swap positions on nuclear power in U.K. In an interesting switcheroo, the U.K.’s Conservative Party, pro-nuclear in the past, and Prime Minister Tony Blair, skeptical of nuclear in the past, have flip-flopped. Blair this week all but promised to build new nuclear power plants to replace old ones set to go out […]

  • Gore’s sources

    I forget who sent me this, but there's a nifty post over on unbossed.com about the sources used for Al Gore's famous slideshow.

  • Samuelson’s counsel of despair

    A column by Robert Samuelson in the Washington Post has conservatives all a-twitter -- appropriate, I guess, since it gathers all the state-of-the-art conservative talking points on global warming in one place.

    Browse around at reactions and the impression you will get above all is that conservatives just don't take the subject very seriously. They're looking for some clever arguments so they can move onto other stuff that gets their viscera churning (terrorism, evil liberals, etc.). This headline is typical: "WaPo: Global Warming a Bunch of Bull."

    Of course, that's not what the column says at all. What the column says is that we can't really do anything about global warming, and any politician who says otherwise is a hypocrite. It advocates despair and surrender.

    There are two primary points in the column, and one conclusion that follows from the two points. Let's take them in order.