Everyone and their cousin has already linked to this, but in case you missed it, Popular Science is running a series of stories called The Future of Energy. It’s good.

And when I say "good," I mean "more or less reflects my own priorities." I was particularly pleased that nuclear didn’t show up on the list and that grid improvements were way up at No. 2. I would have moved "negawatts" — i.e., efficiency and conservation — up higher on the list, and moved hydrogen lower, but those are quibbles. Overall, nice work.

(The editors explain their methodology here.)

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Reader support helps sustain our work. Donate today to keep our climate news free.