Turns out the Apollo folks don't like it either | Grist

Note: We ask republishing partners to include a pixel to help us measure story reach. The only information this tracker gathers is the publication domain and date, and view counts. For questions, email syndication@grist.org

HTML

PLAIN TEXT

<h1>Turns out the Apollo folks don’t like it either</h1>
 
 "This story was originally published by <a href="https://grist.org" title="Grist">Grist</a>. Sign up for Grist's <a href="https://go.grist.org/signup/weekly/partner?utm_campaign=republish-content&utm_medium=syndication&utm_source=partner" title="Weekly newsletter">weekly newsletter here</a>."
 
 
Beneath the fold is an op-ed written in reaction to the energy bill by Robert Borosage and Joel Rogers. Borosage is co-director of the <a href="http://www.ourfuture.org/">Campaign for America’s Future</a> and co-founder, with Rogers, of the <a href="http://www.apolloalliance.org/">Apollo Alliance</a>.
<blockquote>
Gas prices are up. Demand for oil is up. Americans are dying in Iraq, and dependence on Persian Gulf oil is up. Even the president agrees that catastrophic climate change is a real and present danger. America needs a crash program to achieve energy independence. Instead, the energy bill now pending before the Congress displays an abject failure of leadership. New energy for America? Not in this bill.
Our current path is unsustainable. Global competition for oil is soaring while we’re growing ever more dependent on foreign oil – importing over 13.2 million barrels a day. This bill does nothing to reduce that dependence. American soldiers are mired in a war in the region vital to that supply. Imported oil contributes to our unsustainable trade deficits, now over 1.9 billion dollars a day. Over half our water ways are polluted. Children in cities suffer staggering rates of asthma. We’re shipping good jobs abroad. We have to change course.
The Apollo Alliance has outlined a ten-step national agenda of strategic planning and investment that drive for energy independence by the year 2015.
It is hard to overstate the benefits of such a project: 3 million new jobs and more than a trillion dollars in new economic activity, the public revenue from which would easily offset project costs. Such a project would bring jobs to our cities through planning, efficiency and conservation projects. The increased domestic manufacturing generated by such an investment could revitalize a Midwest badly in need of jobs. And alternative fuels and transportation technologies would breathe new life into Detroit and the Great Plains. Not to mention the untold environmental and health benefits of cleaner air and water and more hospitable work and living environments.
The Apollo Alliance has united a broad coalition around these goals, from labor leaders to business executives; from the environmental and civil-rights communities, to urban and rural constituencies and their elected leaders.
But new energy for America requires leadership — and in this energy bill, the president and the Congress have punted. Instead of rallying the nation to a serious agenda, this bill is a shameless concoction of special interest subsidies, largely to big oil and gas producers that actually will leave us more dependent on foreign oil. The president and the Congress had the opportunity to provide good jobs here, put America into the lead in the growth green markets of the future, give our children cleaner water and air, and protect our national security. Instead, they chose business as usual.
It seems likely that the conference report on the Energy Bill will propose a tax package of $11.5 billion. The amount is insufficient to tackle our energy challenges in any significant way. Worse still, nearly $3 billion of that tax package will go to sustain oil and gas companies in importing and processing foreign oil, rather than spurring the development of alternative fuels, renewable sources, energy efficiency and advanced technologies that would make us energy independent.
Whether this bill passes or not, Congress will have to go back to the drawing board next year — and that will take presidential leadership that is sorely lacking.
With the president’s default, our best hope rests with the states and municipalities. Already, progressive governors and state legislators have started to pass groundbreaking state legislation that lowers our energy consumption, creates jobs, increases our security, and better maintains the health of our environment and our children.
In April, Washington Governor Christine Gregoire signed into law State Senate Bill 5509 making Washington State the first state in the country to adopt high performance green building standards for all state funded buildings over 5,000 square feet. The measure, passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, will lower the public sector’s energy demands and costs, create a healthier environment for students and workers, and add new higher-skilled jobs in the construction industry.
Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, recently signed Pennsylvania’s Advanced Energy Portfolio Standard which requires 18 percent of the state’s energy to come from clean or renewable sources. Aside from diversifying Pennsylvania’s energy resources this measure will cut energy costs, encourage technological development and promote economic growth, vital for the state’s beleaguered manufacturing sector. Results have been quick to follow. Already the Spanish aeronautics and wind power company Gamesa has announced plans to locate 18 new wind farms in the Commonwealth in addition to its North American headquarters and a new manufacturing facility.
Still other states and regions are pioneering new ways to engage and tackle the complexities of a changing energy landscape. The Apollo Alliance is driving an effort to line up broad political support across constituencies by building coalitions of labor, environmentalists, urban leaders and business to help move state and urban agendas.
The original Apollo project was launched by President Kennedy who promised to put a man on the moon in a decade. It summoned up the creativity and drive of Americans. Now we need a similar drive to provide new energy for America and eliminate our dependence on foreign oil. The states can show the way – but in the end the President and the Congress must either lead or get out of the way. This is a national security imperative and an economic opportunity that cannot be ignored.
— Robert Borosage and Joel Rogers
</blockquote>

This article originally appeared in <a href="https://grist.org/">Grist</a> at <a href="https://grist.org/article/reaction-to-the-energy-bill-from-the-apollo-alliance/">https://grist.org/article/reaction-to-the-energy-bill-from-the-apollo-alliance/</a>.
 <link href="https://grist.org/article/reaction-to-the-energy-bill-from-the-apollo-alliance/" rel="canonical"/>
 Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at <a href="https://grist.org/">Grist.org</a>
 <script id="grist-syndication-pixel" async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TG2PKBX" data-source="repub" data-canonical="https://grist.org/article/reaction-to-the-energy-bill-from-the-apollo-alliance/" data-title="Turns out the Apollo folks don’t like it either" crossorigin="anonymous"/>

Our goal at Grist is to tell stories about climate solutions and a just future. That means we love when other outlets share our work. If you’re interested in republishing this story online or in print, we just have a few requirements:

Credit us.

For the byline, we prefer Author Name, Grist. At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Grist. Sign up for Grist’s weekly newsletter here.”

Check the image requirements.

Photos sourced from Getty Images in our pieces can be republished as long as you credit both Getty and Grist in the caption. Outside of this, you can’t republish photographs or illustrations without written permission from Grist and/or the photographer.

Don’t change anything significant.

You can change the headline and/or subheading, but articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s ok to change references to time (“yesterday” to “today”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). If you really think changing the story with additional localized copy would help, please contact us directly and we can discuss the change. We must approve the change before it goes live.

Don’t sell our stories.

We also ask that you don’t sell ads specifically meant to be placed in our stories. If you already have ads populating on your site, that’s completely fine.

Keep in contact.

Let us know if you republish our content! As a nonprofit news site, tracking the impact of our reporting and analysis is crucial. We’d love to hear more about how the work was useful to you and your outlet. And on the off chance that we ask you to remove the story from your site or apply a correction, please do so.

Use best practices for sharing.

If you do share the story on your social media accounts, we’d love it if you tagged Grist’s accounts:

Twitter: @Grist
Facebook: @Grist.org
Instagram: @Grist

Get your weekly dose of good climate news to your inbox

Get your weekly dose of good climate news to your inbox

Republish this article | See instructions below:

Turns out the Apollo folks don’t like it either