Senator Byrd stunner:

Note: We ask republishing partners to include a pixel to help us measure story reach. The only information this tracker gathers is the publication domain and date, and view counts. For questions, email syndication@grist.org

HTML

PLAIN TEXT

<h1>Senator Byrd stunner:</h1>
 
 "This story was originally published by <a href="https://grist.org" title="Grist">Grist</a>. Sign up for Grist's <a href="https://go.grist.org/signup/weekly/partner?utm_campaign=republish-content&utm_medium=syndication&utm_source=partner" title="Weekly newsletter">weekly newsletter here</a>."
 
 
<div class="entry">
<blockquote>
 
Change has been a constant throughout the history of our coal industry. West Virginians can choose to anticipate change and adapt to it, or resist and be overrun by it. One thing is clear. The time has arrived for the people of the Mountain State to think long and hard about which course they want to choose.
</blockquote>
Anyone who thought that the senior Senator from West Virginia was a guaranteed “no” vote on the bipartisan climate and clean energy bill needs to rethink that position.  For instance, Nate Silver’s <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/12/03/2009/09/14/2009/09/12/2009/07/14/who-are-the-swing-senators-for-climate-clean-energy-bill/">“Probability of Yes”</a> vote for Byrd is 19.4%.
Byrd’s must-read op-ed, <a title="http://www.wvmetronews.com/index.cfm?func=displayfullstory&storyid=33928" href="http://www.wvmetronews.com/index.cfm?func=displayfullstory&storyid=33928" target="_blank">“Coal Must Embrace The Future,”</a> published today in WV’s MetroNews (and reprinted below) makes clear that he is at the negotiating table.  And for those who find it hard to believe that change could be embraced by the 92-year-old long-time coal supporter who has served in Congress longer than anyone else ever has –  over 50 years in the Senate alone — you can listen to <a href="http://www.wvmetronews.com/mediaplayer.cfm?storyid=33928&source=story">Byrd speaking most of the piece here</a>.
Aaron Weiner of the Washington Independent <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/69615/byrd-coal-must-embrace-the-future">writes</a> of Byrd’s piece, which “even attacks the environmentally detrimental practice of mountaintop mining”:
<blockquote>
Political insiders have portrayed Byrd as a difficult get for Democrats trying to pass cap-and-trade legislation. But as Byrd nears the end of his career and reflects on his legacy, I’ve speculated that he’s more likely to come around to climate legislation — which will be the most important environmental bill in our country’s history, if Congress manages to pass it — than a lot of pundits might think. His piece today suggests a step in that direction.
</blockquote>
Byrd’s vote isn’t a certainty, but I now think it likely he’ll vote to end a conservative filibuster.   This op-ed is more evidence that the Senate is probably going to pass a climate bill next year (see <a title="Permanent Link to Sen. Baucus (D-MT): “There’s no doubt that this Congress is going to pass climate change legislation.”" rel="bookmark" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/12/03/2009/11/06/baucus-congress-is-going-to-pass-climate-bil/">Sen. Baucus (D-MT): “There’s no doubt that this Congress is going to pass climate change legislation”</a> and <a title="Permanent Link to Washington Times: “Obama digs in on global warming” and “stolen e-mails mean less than they seem”" rel="bookmark" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/12/03/2009/11/30/washington-times-climategate-obama-global-warming-stolen-e-mails-not-game-changing/">Washington Times: “Obama digs in on global warming”</a>).
Here’s the full must-read op-ed:
 
<blockquote>
For more than 100 years, coal has been the backbone of the Appalachian economy. Even today, the economies of more than 20 states depend to some degree on the mining of coal. About half of all the electricity generated in America and about one quarter of all the energy consumed globally is generated by coal.
Change is no stranger to the coal industry.  Think of the huge changes which came with the onset of the Machine Age in the late 1800’s.  Mechanization has increased coal production and revenues, but also has eliminated jobs, hurting the economies of coal communities. In 1979, there were 62,500 coal miners in the Mountain State. Today there are about 22,000. In recent years, West Virginia has seen record high coal production and record low coal employment.
And change is undeniably upon the coal industry again.  The increased use of mountaintop removal mining means that fewer miners are needed to meet company production goals. Meanwhile the Central Appalachian coal seams that remain to be mined are becoming thinner and more costly to mine. Mountaintop removal mining, a declining national demand for energy, rising mining costs and erratic spot market prices all add up to fewer jobs in the coal fields.
These are real problems. They affect real people. And West Virginia’s elected officials are rightly concerned about jobs and the economic impact on local communities.  I share those concerns.  But the time has come to have an open and honest dialogue about coal’s future in West Virginia.
Let’s speak the truth. The most important factor in maintaining coal-related jobs is demand for coal. Scapegoating and stoking fear among workers over the permitting process is counter-productive.
Coal companies want a large stockpile of permits in their back pockets because that implies stability to potential investors. But when coal industry representatives stir up public anger toward federal regulatory agencies, it can damage the state’s ability to work with those agencies to West Virginia’s benefit. This, in turn, may create the perception of ineffectiveness within the industry, which can drive potential investors away.
Let’s speak a little more truth here. No deliberate effort to do away with the coal industry could ever succeed in Washington because there is no available alternative energy supply that could immediately supplant the use of coal for base load power generation in America. That is a stubborn fact that vexes some in the environmental community, but it is reality.
It is also a reality that the practice of mountaintop removal mining has a diminishing constituency in Washington. It is not a widespread method of mining, with its use confined to only three states.  Most members of Congress, like most Americans, oppose the practice, and we may not yet fully understand the effects of mountaintop removal mining on the health of our citizens. West Virginians may demonstrate anger toward the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over mountaintop removal mining, but we risk the very probable consequence of shouting ourselves out of any productive dialogue with EPA and our adversaries in the Congress.
Some have even suggested that coal state representatives in Washington should block any advancement of national health care reform legislation until the coal industry’s demands are met by the EPA. I believe that the notion of holding the health care of over 300 million Americans hostage in exchange for a handful of coal permits is beyond foolish; it is morally indefensible.  It is a non-starter, and puts the entire state of West Virginia and the coal industry in a terrible light.
To be part of any solution, one must first acknowledge a problem. To deny the mounting science of climate change is to stick our heads in the sand and say “deal me out.” West Virginia would be much smarter to stay at the table.
The 20 coal-producing states together hold some powerful political cards. We can have a part in shaping energy policy, but we must be honest brokers if we have any prayer of influencing coal policy on looming issues important to the future of coal like hazardous air pollutants, climate change, and federal dollars for investments in clean coal technology.
Most people understand that America cannot meet its current energy needs without coal, but there is strong bi-partisan opposition in Congress 
to the mountaintop removal method of mining it. We have our work cut out for us in finding a prudent and profitable middle ground – but we will not reach it by using fear mongering, grandstanding and outrage as a strategy. As your United States Senator, I must represent the opinions and the best interests of the entire Mountain State, not just those of coal operators and southern coalfield residents who may be strident supporters of mountaintop removal mining.
I have spent the past six months working with a group of coal state Democrats in the Senate, led by West Virginia native Senator Tom Carper (D-Del.), drafting provisions to assist the coal industry in more easily transitioning to a lower-carbon economy. These include increasing funding for clean coal projects and easing emission standards and timelines, setting aside billions of dollars for coal plants that install new technology and continue using coal. These are among the achievable ways coal can continue its major role in our national energy portfolio. It is the best way to step up to the challenge and help lead change.
The truth is that some form of climate legislation will likely become public policy because most American voters want a healthier environment.  Major coal-fired power plants and coal operators operating in West Virginia have wisely already embraced this reality, and are making significant investments to prepare.
The future of coal and indeed of our total energy picture lies in change and innovation. In fact, the future of American industrial power and our economic ability to compete globally depends on our ability to advance energy technology.
The greatest threats to the future of coal do not come from possible constraints on mountaintop removal mining or other environmental regulations, but rather from rigid mindsets, depleting coal reserves, and the declining demand for coal as more power plants begin shifting to biomass and natural gas as a way to reduce emissions.
Fortunately, West Virginia has a running head-start as an innovator. Low-carbon and renewable energy projects are already under development in West Virginia, including:  America’s first integrated carbon capture and sequestration project on a conventional coal-fired power plant in Mason County; the largest wind power facility in the eastern United States; a bio-fuel refinery in Nitro; three large wood pellet plants in Fayette, Randolph, and Gilmer Counties; and major dams capable of generating substantial electricity.
Change has been a constant throughout the history of our coal industry. West Virginians can choose to anticipate change and adapt to it, or resist and be overrun by it.  One thing is clear.  The time has arrived for the people of the Mountain State to think long and hard about which course they want to choose.
</blockquote>
Remarkable.  I predict Byrd will vote for cloture on the bipartisan climate and clean energy bill, that is, vote to end the inevitable, immoral filibuster by the the inevitable, immoral filibuster anti-science conservatives led by James <a title="Permanent Link to Washington Post mocks Inhofe as “the last flat-earther”" rel="bookmark" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/12/03/2009/11/29/2009/11/02/2009/10/28/washington-post-mocks-inhofe-as-the-last-flat-earther/">“the last flat-earther”</a> Inhofe (R-OIL).
Related Posts:
<ul>
<li><a title="Permanent Link to Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) joins key Dems in proposal to boost carbon capture and storage in climate bill" rel="bookmark" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/12/03/2009/09/14/sen-robert-byrd-d-wv-joins-key-dems-in-proposal-to-boost-carbon-capture-and-storage-in-climate-bill/">Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) joins key Dems in proposal to boost carbon capture and storage in climate bill</a></li>
<li><a title="Permanent Link to Byrd rips Massey Energy for refusing to fund a new school so students can move away from coal processing plant." rel="bookmark" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/12/03/2009/10/12/byrd-massey-energy-coal-school-childre/">Byrd rips Massey Energy for refusing to fund a new school so students can move away from coal processing plant.</a></li>
<li><a title="Permanent Link to Is coal with carbon capture and storage a core climate solution?" rel="bookmark" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/12/03/2008/09/29/is-coal-with-carbon-capture-and-storage-a-core-climate-solution/">Is coal with carbon capture and storage a core climate solution?</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript"> toolTips('.classtoolTips0','A technology that catches carbon dioxide at the point of release, preventing it from escaping into Earth’s atmosphere. CSS systems typically are installed on industrial or energy facilities, like coal-burning power plants, where the greenhouse gas is captured, compressed, and then buried deep underground. '); </script>
 This article originally appeared in <a href="https://grist.org/">Grist</a> at <a href="https://grist.org/article/senator-byrd-stunner/">https://grist.org/article/senator-byrd-stunner/</a>.
 <link href="https://grist.org/article/senator-byrd-stunner/" rel="canonical"/>
 Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at <a href="https://grist.org/">Grist.org</a>
 <script id="grist-syndication-pixel" async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TG2PKBX" data-source="repub" data-canonical="https://grist.org/article/senator-byrd-stunner/" data-title="Senator Byrd stunner:" crossorigin="anonymous"/>

Our goal at Grist is to tell stories about climate solutions and a just future. That means we love when other outlets share our work. If you’re interested in republishing this story online or in print, we just have a few requirements:

Credit us.

For the byline, we prefer Author Name, Grist. At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Grist. Sign up for Grist’s weekly newsletter here.”

Check the image requirements.

Photos sourced from Getty Images in our pieces can be republished as long as you credit both Getty and Grist in the caption. Outside of this, you can’t republish photographs or illustrations without written permission from Grist and/or the photographer.

Don’t change anything significant.

You can change the headline and/or subheading, but articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s ok to change references to time (“yesterday” to “today”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). If you really think changing the story with additional localized copy would help, please contact us directly and we can discuss the change. We must approve the change before it goes live.

Don’t sell our stories.

We also ask that you don’t sell ads specifically meant to be placed in our stories. If you already have ads populating on your site, that’s completely fine.

Keep in contact.

Let us know if you republish our content! As a nonprofit news site, tracking the impact of our reporting and analysis is crucial. We’d love to hear more about how the work was useful to you and your outlet. And on the off chance that we ask you to remove the story from your site or apply a correction, please do so.

Use best practices for sharing.

If you do share the story on your social media accounts, we’d love it if you tagged Grist’s accounts:

Twitter: @Grist
Facebook: @Grist.org
Instagram: @Grist

Get your weekly dose of good climate news to your inbox

Get your weekly dose of good climate news to your inbox

Republish this article | See instructions below: