Oy. I used to think the introduction of hybrid SUVs was generally a good thing — with perhaps even greater potential for saving fuel than hybrid cars. But this New York Times article brings up a point I simply hadn’t considered: Buying a fuel-efficient SUV makes it possible for car companies to sell big gas guzzlers without incurring any penalties under federal CAFE (corporate average fuel economy) standards. From the article:

[E]very Toyota Highlander hybrid S.U.V. begets a hulking Lexus S.U.V., and every Ford Escape — the hybrid S.U.V. that Kermit the Frog hawked during the Super Bowl — makes room for a Lincoln Navigator, which gets all of 12 miles a gallon. Instead of simply saving gas when you buy a hybrid, you’re giving somebody else the right to use it.

Reader support helps sustain our work. Donate today to keep our climate news free. All donations DOUBLED!

This is vexing, to say the least.But it also underscores a point that’s hard to overstress: When it comes to saving energy, a broken system can trump individual virtue. That is, any time a conscientious and enlightened consumer decides to do something selfless, our energy system pushes back a bit. Use a little less gas, and the oil market responds by letting someone else tank up a little more cheaply. Buy an efficient vehicle, and you make room under CAFE standards for someone else to buy a wheeled behemoth. And so it goes.

Of course, I don’t mean to suggest that it’s completely futile to make efficient buys — not by a long shot. But particularly when it comes to energy, the collective good wrought by environmentally conscious consumers is typically less than one might hope. To me, this underscores a simple point: Changing your own behavior is a good idea, but changing the system is far, far more important.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.