On Wednesday, the Supreme Court considered its first global warming case ever. At issue is whether carbon dioxide falls under the Clean Air Act’s definition of “pollutant” and thus whether the EPA has the responsibility to regulate emissions thereof. The ramifications of their decision could be huge — yet this is what went on in those vaunted halls of justice yesterday:

Scalia prompted laughter when he questioned whether carbon dioxide was an air pollutant or a stratosphere pollutant.

Your support powers solutions-focused climate reporting — keeping it free for everyone. All donations DOUBLED for a limited time. Give now in under 45 seconds.
Secure · Tax deductible · Takes 45 Seconds

Stories like this don’t tell themselves.

Make others like it possible. Your support powers solutions-focused climate reporting — keeping it free for everyone. Give now in under 45 seconds.
Secure · Tax deductible · Takes 45 Seconds

“Respectfully, your honor, it is not the stratosphere. It’s the troposphere,” said Milkey, referring to atmospheric layers that can be affected by pollution.

“Troposphere, whatever,” Scalia said as the normally silent gallery erupted in chuckles. “I told you before I’m not a scientist. That’s why I don’t want to have to deal with global warming.”

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

To support our nonprofit environmental journalism, please consider disabling your ad-blocker to allow ads on Grist. Here's How

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on this case by the middle of next year.

Wince.