Articles by David Roberts

Whistle while you work

We've all seen the trickle of stories over the last few years about environmental officials in the Bush administration either quitting in protest or formally applying for whistle-blower status (we've also read about the Bush admin's unprecedented efforts to reduce protections for whistle-blowers).

However, the latest edition of the Sierra Club's "RAW" email really brings the point home.  It offers a list of whistle-blowers, their agencies and complaints.  It's pretty stunning.

For the defense: Connaughton

Following up on yesterday's live chat with LCV's Deb Callahan, today The Washington Post is hosting a live chat with James L. Connaughton, White House Council on Environmental Quality Chairman.  He will, presumably, be defending the Bush environmental record.  Stop by and ask him a question.

UPDATE: It's over and it was, predictably, thoroughly unsatisfying. It sounded like it could have been written by a robot that trolled through Bush administration website pages and extracted boilerplate. Maybe it was.

Questions = disloyalty

From Ron Suskind's new piece in New York Times Magazine:

A writ of infallibility -- a premise beneath the powerful Bushian certainty that has, in many ways, moved mountains -- is not just for public consumption: it has guided the inner life of the White House. As [Christine Todd] Whitman told me on the day in May 2003 that she announced her resignation as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency: ''In meetings, I'd ask if there were any facts to support our case. And for that, I was accused of disloyalty!'' (Whitman, whose faith in Bush has since been renewed, denies making these remarks and is now a leader of the president's re-election effort in New Jersey.)

Revealing on so many levels ...

I heart Seth Borenstein

When it comes to the environment (and foreign policy, incidentally), scrappy little Knight Ridder kicks Reuters' and AP's ass.  How?  By telling it like it is, without a flabby layer of "balance" obscuring the truth.  The mainstream media is increasingly crippled by its own conventions.  No matter how outrageous the charge, or clear the facts, the media feels duty bound to present every issue as "he said, she said."  This practice, as many folks have suggested, benefits the people who lie.  Every lie is presented on equal footing with the truth.  It gives readers the impression that nothing is a plain matter of fact, that everything -- the temperature of our atmosphere, the condition of Iraq, the beneficiaries of the tax cut -- is simply a matter of partisan spin.  But of course, with all due respect to Derrida (R.I.P.), there are facts, and real journalists should not be afraid simply to state them.

With that said, I give you Seth Borenstein of Knight Ridder.