Gristmill

Plan B tries again

Plan B, the emergency contraceptive rejected for over-the-counter sales by the FDA in May, has reapplied after limiting sales to those 16 years of age and older.

Concern about sales of the contraceptive to young teens was the FDA's putative reason for rejecting Plan B, despite the overwhelming support for the medicine from FDA's scientific panel. Many observers believe that the FDA's director bowed to pressure from the anti-abortion movement and its allies in the Bush administration.

But Plan B is likely to slash the number of abortions. As the PI article reports:

James Trussell, director of Princeton University's Office of Population Research . . . has concluded that easy access to emergency contraception could cut by half the number of unintended pregnancies and abortions among U.S. women, ages 15 to 44.

Whistle while you work

We've all seen the trickle of stories over the last few years about environmental officials in the Bush administration either quitting in protest or formally applying for whistle-blower status (we've also read about the Bush admin's unprecedented efforts to reduce protections for whistle-blowers).

However, the latest edition of the Sierra Club's "RAW" email really brings the point home.  It offers a list of whistle-blowers, their agencies and complaints.  It's pretty stunning.

For the defense: Connaughton

Following up on yesterday's live chat with LCV's Deb Callahan, today The Washington Post is hosting a live chat with James L. Connaughton, White House Council on Environmental Quality Chairman.  He will, presumably, be defending the Bush environmental record.  Stop by and ask him a question.

UPDATE: It's over and it was, predictably, thoroughly unsatisfying. It sounded like it could have been written by a robot that trolled through Bush administration website pages and extracted boilerplate. Maybe it was.

Questions = disloyalty

From Ron Suskind's new piece in New York Times Magazine:

A writ of infallibility -- a premise beneath the powerful Bushian certainty that has, in many ways, moved mountains -- is not just for public consumption: it has guided the inner life of the White House. As [Christine Todd] Whitman told me on the day in May 2003 that she announced her resignation as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency: ''In meetings, I'd ask if there were any facts to support our case. And for that, I was accused of disloyalty!'' (Whitman, whose faith in Bush has since been renewed, denies making these remarks and is now a leader of the president's re-election effort in New Jersey.)

Revealing on so many levels ...

I heart Seth Borenstein

When it comes to the environment (and foreign policy, incidentally), scrappy little Knight Ridder kicks Reuters' and AP's ass.  How?  By telling it like it is, without a flabby layer of "balance" obscuring the truth.  The mainstream media is increasingly crippled by its own conventions.  No matter how outrageous the charge, or clear the facts, the media feels duty bound to present every issue as "he said, she said."  This practice, as many folks have suggested, benefits the people who lie.  Every lie is presented on equal footing with the truth.  It gives readers the impression that nothing is a plain matter of fact, that everything -- the temperature of our atmosphere, the condition of Iraq, the beneficiaries of the tax cut -- is simply a matter of partisan spin.  But of course, with all due respect to Derrida (R.I.P.), there are facts, and real journalists should not be afraid simply to state them.

With that said, I give you Seth Borenstein of Knight Ridder.

MDGs: You make the call

Now is your chance to have a say at the U.N.

Jeff Sachs' Millennium Project has produced a draft report of its Global Plan to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals and it is open for public comment until Nov. 1.  U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan and U.N. Development Programme chief Mark Mallach Brown asked Sachs to honcho ten task forces with 250 experts to formulate a game plan for achieving the eight ambitious MDGs by 2015.  The final report is to be delivered to the SG in January.

Although the MDGs have gained little political traction in Washington, many outside the United States are utilizing the education, health, environment, poverty, hunger, and governance targets to set agendas, leverage resources, and in the case of some NGOs, hold national governments accountable for the targets they signed up for at the 2000 Millennium Summit.  Not many are optimistic about meeting goals like halving the proportion of people without access to clean water by 2015.  But we lose nothing by trying, so bring it on.

Geoff Dabelko

It was fitting that recognition of environment's links to conflict and security came out of Norway last week when the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Wangari Maathai of Kenya for her decades-long work through her Green Belt Movement.  We often count on the Norwegians, and the Nordics in general, to get it right early and for the rest of us to catch up.

In fact it was nearly twenty years ago when Gro Harlem Brundtland, then Prime Minister of Norway, chaired the World Commission on Environment and Development, a group of international bigwigs that authored the influential volume Our Common Future.  We remember that 1987 book that set the agenda for the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio for its widely accepted definition of sustainable development (meeting the needs of current generations without jeopardizing the ability of future generations to meet their own). But often forgotten is the chapter where the Brundtland Commission explicitly traced the destructive links between environment, conflict, and security.

So it was doubly disappointing to read in The New York Times the disparaging quotes from officials of both right and left-leaning parties in Norway in the wake of the announcement.

All the mus(ing) that’s fit to print

In its Sunday endorsement of Kerry and scathing critique of Bush, The New York Times spends more time on the environment than the candidates did in their three debates. (To whom does such an endorsement speak -- do any undecideds read The Times?) Amidst the many many paragraphs that lay out an argument against a second Bush administration, the patient greenie finds this one:

If Mr. Bush had wanted to make a mark on an issue on which Republicans and Democrats have long made common cause, he could have picked the environment. Christie Whitman, the former New Jersey governor chosen to run the Environmental Protection Agency, came from that bipartisan tradition. Yet she left after three years of futile struggle against the ideologues and industry lobbyists Mr. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney had installed in every other important environmental post. The result has been a systematic weakening of regulatory safeguards across the entire spectrum of environmental issues, from clean air to wilderness protection.

The editorial spends more time condemning Bush's record than building a case for a Kerry presidency. Yet, the editorial board found space among the relatively few sentences allocated to praising Kerry to call attention to this environmental matter:

Live chat about the environment in election 2004

At 1pm ET on Monday, The Washington Post is hosting a live chat with Deb Callahan, president of the League of Conservation Voters.  Go submit a question and tune in when it gets underway.  If you feel you simply must mention Grist, well, who am I to stop you?

UPDATE: It's underway. Head on over.

UPDATE: It's over, but it's still on the site. It was mildly interesting -- as much as hasty replies in one hour can be. My efforts to submit a question subtly hyping Grist were for naught. Sigh.