We’ve heard scads about Wal-Mart turning over a big, fat green leaf (here and here and here and probably lots of other places, too).

Well, here’s another one reported by Fast Company that really left my jaw hanging open:

In the next 12 months, starting with a major push this month, Wal-Mart wants to sell every one of its regular customers — 100 million in all — one swirl bulb. In the process, Wal-Mart wants to change energy consumption in the United States, and energy consciousness, too.

Grist relies on the support of generous readers like you. Donate today to keep our climate news free. All donations matched!

Of course they’ve got the old self-interest motive going:

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

It also aims to change its own reputation, to use swirls to make clear how seriously Wal-Mart takes its new positioning as an environmental activist.

But that’s still a s**tload of energy saved. It’s a doubling of CFL sales in 1 year! In terms of energy savings, it stacks up like this:

[110,000,000 60 watt replacements are] enough electricity saved to power all the homes in Delaware and Rhode Island … one bulb [in every household] is equivalent to taking 1.3 million cars off the roads.

There’s lots of interesting data and commentary in the article — about the ripple effects of a shift to CFLs, why GE might be eager to partner with Wal-Mart on a project that could hit them hard, and how Wal-Mart is thinking about this effort.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

A switch to CFLs could represent a stabilization wedge of its own, and potentially could send big positive signals throughout society that efficiency matters. I’m certainly sensitive to concerns about Wal-Mart, especially their labor practices (note: this article mentions as a cost — not labor — issue that CFLs require Chinese laborers to hand twist the tubes). However, a shift to CFLs seems like a really big step in the right direction.

Anyone want to comment on the downsides?