Logically, Bush could just decree it.

Consider:

President Bush argues that we are at war (against "terror"), that the war will go in indefinitely, and that he alone decides what constitutes a cessation of conflict.

President Bush argues that the executive branch has what amounts to absolute power on matters of national security during wartime, irrespective of statute and without Congressional oversight.

President Bush argues that making the U.S. independent of "foreign oil" is an issue of national security.

President Bush argues that drilling in the Arctic Refuge could help make the U.S. independent of foreign oil.

Given the above, why can't Bush just decree that the Arctic Refuge will be opened to drilling?

Consider:

President Bush argues that we are at war (against "terror"), that the war will go in indefinitely, and that he alone decides what constitutes a cessation of conflict.
President Bush argues that the executive branch has what amounts to absolute power on matters of national security during wartime, irrespective of statute and without Congressional oversight.
President Bush argues that making the U.S. independent of "foreign oil" is an issue of national security.
President Bush argues that drilling in the Arctic Refuge could help make the U.S. independent of foreign oil.

Given the above, why can’t Bush just decree that the Arctic Refuge will be opened to drilling?

A message from

All donations DOUBLED!

Grist is the only award-winning newsroom focused on exploring equitable solutions to climate change. It’s vital reporting made entirely possible by loyal readers like you. At Grist, we don’t believe in paywalls. Instead, we rely on our readers to pitch in what they can so that we can continue bringing you our solution-based climate news.

Donate Now Not Now