Uncategorized

Sic transit beach front real estate

Last month was the first time in history that China reported higher total exports than the U.S.

China's State Statistical Bureau reported total exports in July of US$80.34 billion, nudging ahead of the U.S. ($80.31 billion) as the world's biggest exporter of goods and services. Of course, China's gross national income (US$7.6 trillion in 2005) is still only 65% of the US (US$11.7 trillion), but China's economy has been growing three times faster over the past five years (9.4% annually versus 3.2%).

As China's export-led economy grows, so does its environmental footprint. Total carbon dioxide emissions in China in 2003 were 3.5 billion tonnes, 60% of the U.S. total in the same year. But between 1990 and 2002, China's emissions jumped 46% -- an average growth rate of 3.2% -- while U.S. total emissions grew at a more modest (but still horrifying) rate of 1.5% per year over the same period.

Protecting the base of the Southern ocean marine food web

Krill are the basis of life for hundreds of different species of fish, seabirds, and marine mammals. Vast krill banks in the icy Southern Ocean are now targets of a new generation of factory trawlers that can vacuum up as much as 120,000 tonnes of krill in a season, most of it intended for use as food for industrially-farmed salmon.

Decline or collapse of the antarctic krill banks could have immense effects on dependent predators such as whales, penguins, and seals.

In October, the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) will meet in Australia to consider stronger measures to protect the Southern Ocean krill. Read Clifton Curtis' op-ed in the IHT. (Curtis directs the Pew Charitable Trust's Antarctic Krill Conservation Project.)

The former draws the wrong lessons from the latter

The Mustache of Understanding brings us another variant of the Brazil is awesome! story, and commits the standard two errors:

1. He conflates corn-based and cellulosic ethanol, failing to note that Brazil uses the latter and we the former.
2. He makes no mention of the fact that Brazil's per-capita energy use is about an eighth of ours (1,064 vs. 7,921 kgoe per-person-per-year, as of 2001).

These facts are relevant to an assessment of Brazil's success with biofuels, no?

A way to stamp out SUVs

John asked yesterday why we hadn't managed to get rid of the SUV.

Why? Because we haven't yet organized anything like this.

Montana and Nevada ‘regulatory-takings’ initiatives die

"Regulatory-takings" initiatives -- like the dread Measure 37 in Oregon -- have died in Montana and Nevada. A significant victory for the forces of good and light.

Check it out

This video is from an incredibly clever ad campaign by Solon AG Fuer Solartechnik, a solar-cell and -panel manufacturer:

A nice package of stories that aren’t about rich people

L.A. Weekly has a package of stories on green building that, in the words of editor Linda Immediato, "DOESN'T involve tear-downs, massive square footage homes and insane water-intensive landscaping." Huzzah for that!

The lead piece is "Green Without Envy," about the many ways existing homes can be added to, tweaked, or remodeled -- instead of torn down -- to increase their green-friendliness.

Also check out similarly sensible articles on lawns, floors, and individual rooms, as well as a piece on the shortcomings of LEED and another one on, er, re-using a Boeing 747 as a house.

Good stuff.

Jerks.

I try to be a good person. I try to keep love in my heart for all people. Why do they make it so hard?

Declaring them "mature technologies" that need no further funding, the Bush administration in its FY 2007 budget request eliminates hydropower and geothermal research, venerable programs with roots in the energy crises of the 1970s.

We're talking about -- cumulatively -- roughly $50 million in research money. There's nowhere else in the federal budget we could find $50 million to trim? Really?

Oh, wait, but look, we're not even saving the money, just reallocating it:

Any savings from the cuts would be nil since all of the nearly $24 million ($1 million from hydropower and $23 million from geothermal) research funding would go to other programs such as biofuels.

Why? Why?

It's a small amount, but it matters quite a bit to the people laboring in the trenches studying this stuff:

More ideas needed

Here's a recent story of how two poachers, while posing as tourists, managed to slip away just long enough to kill a couple of rhinos and cut their horns off.

National Geographic has this story about the discovery of a critically endangered male Sumatran rhino in Malaysia. Problem is, that horn sure would make a nice dagger handle. It is just a matter of time now before the locals find out one is there.

This problem has been discussed a few times in letters to Science magazine: Biologists report finding an endangered species only to lose it again to collectors and poachers who learned of its whereabouts from the same report. This profit motive thing is powerful. Maybe we should be looking harder for ways to use it to protect what remains.

Why canvassing no longer works

A while back, Nathan Wyeth wrote a Soapbox for Grist about the crappiness of green-group canvassing operations. It kicked off quite a discussion.

If you're interested in the subject, Dana Fisher has a good piece on it at The American Prospect: