The Climate Post: Oil Spills, Caucus Thrills

Note: We ask republishing partners to include a pixel to help us measure story reach. The only information this tracker gathers is the publication domain and date, and view counts. For questions, email syndication@grist.org

HTML

PLAIN TEXT

<h1>The Climate Post: Oil Spills, Caucus Thrills</h1>
 
 "This story was originally published by <a href="https://grist.org" title="Grist">Grist</a>. Sign up for Grist's <a href="https://go.grist.org/signup/weekly/partner?utm_campaign=republish-content&utm_medium=syndication&utm_source=partner" title="Weekly newsletter">weekly newsletter here</a>."
 
 
<div class="main" style="padding:0;margin:0;">
<div class="snap_preview" style="padding:0;margin:0;">
First Things First: The BP oil spill today became the biggest such disaster ever in the Gulf, eclipsing the Ixtoc I spill off Mexico in 1979-1980, according to high-end government <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100701/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill">estimates</a>. A federal judge last week struck down the Obama administration’s six-month moratorium on offshore drilling in the Gulf. U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman instantly became an overnight “<a href="http://www.kansascity.com/2010/06/27/2048055/louisiana-applauds-judges-offshore.html">folk hero</a>” to some in the Gulf. The Interior Department is developing a new moratorium, but has yet to share <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-30/salazar-gives-few-clues-on-new-deep-water-drill-ban.html">details</a>. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal has assumed the public mantle of leadership in the crisis, implicating the federal government response as a failure. This transparency only goes so far, though. Jindal last week <a href="http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/30/a-governor-seals-oil-spill-records/">vetoed</a> a state bill that would have opened to the public all documents about the spill from his office.
“Destruction could be there”: Senate Democrats streamed out of a lively caucus meeting last week described alternately as “<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2010/06/25/25climatewire-democrats-fix-strategy-for-undefined-climate-69494.html">thrilling</a>” and “inspirational.” Palpable skepticism of Democratic glee in a Hill <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/105355-dems-tout-thrilling-inspiration-best-caucus-ever">story</a> was reinforced several days later when 23 senators and President Barack Obama failed to replicate the same tone in a “<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/106331-no-breakthrough-at-climate-meeting">much-hyped</a>” meeting about possible climate-and-energy legislation. The bipartisan group cleared no smooth path forward. In the absence of a 60-vote majority on key climate policy points, the Democratic senate leadership could try and graft climate provisions into energy and oil-spill legislation. The Hill attributes to that all-seeing, all-knowing Washington force, “<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/106331-no-breakthrough-at-climate-meeting">speculation</a>,” predictions that the base bill will look a lot like the energy bill approved by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee last year. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the key Republican who dropped his support for a climate bill, skipped the White House meeting but shows up in this weekend’s New York Times magazine, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/04/magazine/04graham-t.html?_r=1&hp">profiled</a> as “This Year’s Maverick.”
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid characterized the problem <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2010/06/25/25climatewire-democrats-fix-strategy-for-undefined-climate-69494.html">this</a> way: “The Democratic caucus realizes that we have a problem[.] We have a phenomenon here that if we don’t do something about, our planet’s destruction could be there. The security of our nation depends on a good energy policy.” Reid is facing re-election in November, against Republican and Tea Party <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/15/AR2010061505895.html?hpid=topnews">challenger</a>, Sharron Angle. Nevada’s unique role in the nation’s struggle over nuclear power reemerged this week when judges at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/30/science/earth/30nuke.html?hp">prohibited</a> the White House from rescinding an application to develop a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain. Reid had strongly supported the president’s move, which fulfilled a campaign promise.
Robert Stavins of Harvard’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs writes of climate legislation, “Meaningful action of some kind is still possible, or at least conceivable.” He offers a quick reminder and explainer of the main policy instruments <a href="http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/analysis/stavins/">here</a>.
Mannhunt ends: An investigative committee at Pennsylvania State University has dismissed misconduct charges leveled against meteorology professor Michael Mann. Mann was one of the climate researchers whose e-mail inbox was exposed last November when servers at the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit were <a href="http://views.washingtonpost.com/climate-change/post-carbon/2010/07/by_juliet_eilperin_a_pennsylvania.html">hacked</a>. People inside and outside climate science community have chewed over Mann’s work for a long time now, and this was not his first turn under bright lights. “Climategate” was a scale above previous discussions, as those inclined to see scientific conspiracy discovered a cache of material to quote out-of-context.
Accusations made of scientists during climategate are under scrutiny elsewhere. The Sunday Times of London<a href="http://www.nicholas.duke.edu/thegreengrok/sundaytimes">retracted</a> a Jan. 31, 2010 story that slammed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for allegedly basing projections about Amazon rainforests’ vulnerability to climate change on environmentalists’ advocacy materials. In fact, the research was conducted by established scientists and peer-reviewed. Elsewhere, the University of Virginia is<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/virginiapolitics/2010/06/the_university_of_virginia_tol.html">fighting</a> a request by the commonwealth’s attorney general for Michael Mann’s research material when he worked for UVA.
 
Heat stress in the Capital: Five senior citizens have died in the record-smashing hottest June in Washington, DC history. Four people passed away in homes without air conditioning; the fifth collapsed outside. The region’s temperatures <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitalweathergang/2010/07/june_2010_sets_warmth_record_i.html">averaged</a> 80.6 degrees. On 18 days the mercury soared above 90, including an 11-day stretch in the last two weeks. The Washington Post runs a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/29/AR2010062905051.html">story</a> about the heat deaths on the front of its Metro section, which seems like a reasonable place for it. It’s the kind of notice that newspapers have run for decades when heat or extreme we 
ather reach tragic levels. But these days such notices are incomplete without discussing extreme local weather events in the context of our best understanding of climate change. March, April, May, and June 2010 have each broken global temperature <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/?report=global&year=2010&month=5&submitted=Get+Report">records</a> (2010 also claims the sixth warmest February, and the fourth hottest January). The more scientists focus their models into regions, or back in time, the less certain such models become. Under current projections, the number of days with a peak temperature above 90 degrees F “is expected to rise<a href="http://www.globalchange.gov/publications/reports/scientific-assessments/us-impacts/regional-climate-change-impacts/southeast#issue1">significantly</a>, especially under a higher emissions scenario”—the scenario we are currently pursuing, according to the U.S. Global Change Research Program’s 2009 report.
Trial by Tabloid: Police in Portland, Ore., have reopened an investigation into allegations that Al Gore “made unwanted sexual advances” toward a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/01/AR2010070100998.html">masseuse</a> in October 2006. The National Enquirer broke the story. Gore has categorically denied any wrongdoing. One of two things will happen to this story: It will disappear or it will continue. Either way, as I’ve pointed out repeatedly over the last few years, climate change is not a phenomenon that has anything to do with the former vice president. This fact is intuitively understood abroad, particularly in the parts of the world where people don’t know Al Gore or they don’t know that he divides Americans into at least three groups: pro, contra, and “over the whole thing.” Some of the more piquant political commentators in the U.S. conflate the man with the cause, and the practice is unlikely to disappear soon.
“If you’re explaining, you’re losing”:
<a href="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/01/climate-obesity-and-the-aflac-duck/"> </a>
Eric Roston is Senior Associate at the <a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/" target="_blank">Nicholas Institute </a>and author of <a href="http://www.thecarbonage.com/" target="_blank">The Carbon Age</a>: How Life’s Core Element Has Become Civilization’s Greatest Threat. Prologue available at <a href="/article/2009-07-09-what-is-carbon" target="_blank">Grist</a>. Chapter about Ginkgo biloba and climate change available at <a href="http://www.conservationmagazine.org/articles/v10n4/survivor-essay/" target="_blank">Conservation</a>.
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
 
<a href="http://theclimatepost.wordpress.com/">The Climate Post</a> offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday by <a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/">Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions</a>.

This article originally appeared in <a href="https://grist.org/">Grist</a> at <a href="https://grist.org/article/the-climate-post-oil-spills-caucus-thrills/">https://grist.org/article/the-climate-post-oil-spills-caucus-thrills/</a>.
 <link href="https://grist.org/article/the-climate-post-oil-spills-caucus-thrills/" rel="canonical"/>
 Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at <a href="https://grist.org/">Grist.org</a>
 <script id="grist-syndication-pixel" async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TG2PKBX" data-source="repub" data-canonical="https://grist.org/article/the-climate-post-oil-spills-caucus-thrills/" data-title="The Climate Post: Oil Spills, Caucus Thrills" crossorigin="anonymous"/>

Our goal at Grist is to tell stories about climate solutions and a just future. That means we love when other outlets share our work. If you’re interested in republishing this story online or in print, we just have a few requirements:

Credit us.

For the byline, we prefer Author Name, Grist. At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Grist. Sign up for Grist’s weekly newsletter here.”

Check the image requirements.

Photos sourced from Getty Images in our pieces can be republished as long as you credit both Getty and Grist in the caption. Outside of this, you can’t republish photographs or illustrations without written permission from Grist and/or the photographer.

Don’t change anything significant.

You can change the headline and/or subheading, but articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s ok to change references to time (“yesterday” to “today”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). If you really think changing the story with additional localized copy would help, please contact us directly and we can discuss the change. We must approve the change before it goes live.

Don’t sell our stories.

We also ask that you don’t sell ads specifically meant to be placed in our stories. If you already have ads populating on your site, that’s completely fine.

Keep in contact.

Let us know if you republish our content! As a nonprofit news site, tracking the impact of our reporting and analysis is crucial. We’d love to hear more about how the work was useful to you and your outlet. And on the off chance that we ask you to remove the story from your site or apply a correction, please do so.

Use best practices for sharing.

If you do share the story on your social media accounts, we’d love it if you tagged Grist’s accounts:

Twitter: @Grist
Facebook: @Grist.org
Instagram: @Grist

Get your weekly dose of good climate news to your inbox

Get your weekly dose of good climate news to your inbox

Republish this article | See instructions below: