Articles by David Roberts

A report

I'm here in San Francisco at the Green Festival -- billed as the world's largest green expo. The San Fran convention center is packed to the rafters with booths, booths, booths.

It is somewhat verboten to say so these days, but the predominant vibe is still distinctly hippie. (As I wrote that, a small troop of people wandered by playing drums and tooting on flutes.) Dreadlocks abound. Tofu products are ubiquitous. The word "spirit" is deployed with alarming frequency. There's batik and tie-dye and didgeridoo honking and so forth. It's like an enormous Grateful Dead parking lot.

Voters like or don’t like, nothing more complicated than that

Amanda's article is good, but I tend to think that pundits and politicians vastly overinterpret election results. Everyone tries to figure out what "message" voters were sending, and just about everyone tends to find a message that, surprise, lines up with their own political predilections. For my part, I think the Dem victory on Tues. was a clear message from voters that I deserve a raise.

Really, though, I suspect the general public sends one of two messages in any given election: "eeennnh" (displeased) or "eh" (disinterested). Any interpretation beyond that tends to do little but reflect the interpreter's filter.

Ethanol subsidies, that is

Oh great. The White House needs to recapture some political momentum after its party got shellacked this week. It also needs to make good on its laughable promise to "change the tone" and start working with Democrats to "get things done."

So where does it turn? What issue can unite politicians across the fractious partisan divide?

You guessed it: ethanol subsidies energy independence!

The Bush administration will soon launch a big "energy independence" initiative, likely to include renewed emphasis on biofuels, as part of an attempt to regain the political initiative following the midterm elections.

Ugh. The question, as always, is whether this momentum toward biofuels will serve as a kind of kickstart to a broader conversation about energy and climate, or whether it will be a diversion and a dead end. I go back and forth.

Let me just pick on one thing from this article. Look at this:

The producer of the controversial wind-credit cards speaks out

The following is a guest essay from Ted Rose. He is director of business development at Renewable Choice Energy, the company that makes the controversial Wind Power Cards sold at Whole Foods Market.

-----

We here at Renewable Choice hoped the introduction of the Wind Power Card would spark a discussion. Well, mission accomplished. My only personal regret is that I've been so absorbed with the rollout of the product I haven't had a chance to weigh in on the debate until now.

People have wondered why Renewable Choice introduced the Wind Power Card in the first place. That's easy. The goal of the product -- like everything else we do -- is to provide choices that help move our country beyond fossil fuels.

In the case of the Wind Power Card, we're taking on home electricity. For almost a hundred years, we've been taught that our electricity is invisible, cheap, and harmless. This is an example of what I've started calling dinosaur thinking -- old logic that fits neatly with the interests of fossil fuel companies and hurts just about everyone else.

The truth, as most Grist readers know, is that our electricity is killing us. It's producing air pollution and contributing to global warming. Lots of consumers -- not just hard-core environmentalists -- need to learn this and learn it quick. I believe they also need choices, easy choices, to do something about it. That's why Renewable Choice made the Wind Power Card.