How rain on Election Day helps Republicans
With basically a billion reports of long lines at polling places today, many of them outside, it’s natural to wonder how weather affects voter turnout. Would you like to stand in the rain two hours to vote for Mitt Romney? No, you would probably not.
[E]ach inch of rain experienced on election day drove down voter turnout by an average of just under 1%, while each inch of snow knocked 0.5% off turnout. Though the effect of snow is less on a “per inch” basis, since multiple-inch snowfall totals are far more common than multiple-inch rainfall events, we can conclude that snow is likely to have a bigger negative impact on voter turnout.
Furthermore, Gomez et al. noted that when bad weather did suppress voter turnout, it tended to do so in favor of the republican candidate, to the tune of around 2.5% for each inch of rainfall above normal. In fact, when they simulated the 14 presidential elections between 1948 and 2000 with sunny conditions nationwide, they found two instances in which bad weather likely changed the electoral college outcome – once in North Carolina in 1992, and once in Florida in 2000. The latter change is particularly notable, as it would have resulted in Al Gore rather than George Bush winning the presidential election that year.
It’s worth noting that one of the apparent effects of climate change is increased precipitation. As we reported a few months ago, storms over the last 60 years have grown larger and more intense, with increasing amounts of snow and rain.
Maybe, then, this whole GOP opposition to climate action has nothing to do with Republicans being beholden to fossil fuel companies. Maybe it’s just a concerted effort to increase precipitation on Election Day to 40 inches above normal, thereby ensuring 100 percent of the vote.
Almost have to respect the long game on that one.