Ralph Nader’s endorsement of Edwards sure sounds more like an undorsement of Clinton. Questions:

  1. Is Nader’s endorsal opposition to Clinton more irrelevant to her chances than another Nader presidential run would be, or the same amount of irrelevant?
  2. Will this cause Edwards to lose support, as Dem primary voters deploy the sensible heuristic that the opposite direction from Nader’s political instincts is the best way to go?
  3. Is Cynthia McKinney pissed about this?