Last month, the U.K. government grouped energy and environmental policy under a single department. Last week, the Canadian government put the economy, environment, and energy security together under a single ministry.

This reflects growing realization in the developed world that environmental policy is no longer an add-on, no longer an altruistic affair to be addressed when other priorities are taken care of. Our energy security is our environmental security is our economic security.

My question: What would it look like if Obama did something similar?

Reader support helps sustain our work. Donate today to keep our climate news free. All donations DOUBLED!

Looking through the list of U.S. cabinet positions, it strikes me that responsibility for climate change-related policy is spread wide and thin: Secretary of State (international treaties), Defense, Interior, Agriculture, HUD, Transportation, and Energy.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.


  • Elevate EPA to cabinet level; put it in charge of climate policy.
  • Create a cabinet-level Secretary of Climate.
  • Change the mandate, and raise the budget and profile, of the DOE.
  • Per Hillary Clinton’s plan, create a National Energy Council modeled on the National Security Council, to coordinate climate/energy policy across departments.
  • Appoint some kind of czar. Everybody loves a czar.

What do y’all think? What’s the best way to rationalize climate/energy policy in the U.S. at an bureaucratic level?