Tilman on biofuels in Sunday’s Washington Post: eminently readable and reasonable on parsing the differences between good and bad biofuels, drops in ethanol production in Brazil, what renewable really means, and where we should go from here.
The op-ed’s based on his December Science study, which was discussed here. Everything he writes makes so much sense. Why can’t all scientists be this articulate?

Screwed by climate change: 10 cities that will be hardest hit
House votes to take Keystone decision out of Obama’s hands
No whey: Greek yogurt imperils fish
Comments