When the media talks about clean energy, it usually deals with the cost issue with a rational, balanced analysis. Something along the lines of, say, “It’s so expensive!

Yet somehow, in Keith Johnson’s Environmental Capital blog post today slamming greens for not supporting nukes, the cost issue is little more than an afterthought. The nuclear industry wants $50 billion in loan guarantees? Hardly seems worth mentioning.

Your support powers solutions-focused climate reporting — keeping it free for everyone. All donations DOUBLED for a limited time. Give now in under 45 seconds.
Secure · Tax deductible · Takes 45 Seconds

Does this article feel meaningful?

Make others like it possible. Your support powers solutions-focused climate reporting — keeping it free for everyone. Give now in under 45 seconds.
Secure · Tax deductible · Takes 45 Seconds

A full 320 words into a 346 word post, Johnson shares this insight:

Plus, nuclear power’s not cheap.

Oh, really? Glad he managed to squeeze that five-word footnote in. Johnson also finds the space to devote a whole 20 words to the fact that we have no idea what to do with all the waste that remains radioactive for a quarter of a million years or so. Apparently left on the cutting room floor: Nuclear uses massive amounts of water at a time of tightening water supplies. But hey, I guess there are major space constraints with this whole blogging thing.