Here’s an interview with Gilbert Metcalf, a Tufts University economics professor who’s been circulating a carbon tax proposal (PDF) that’s revenue neutral — it uses the carbon tax revenue to reduce other taxes. It’s called the "Green Tax Swap." Good stuff.

Here’s one good bit :

SM: Rep. John Dingell said he plans to propose a carbon tax, knowing Congress and voters won’t go for it. Why would your approach be different?

Grist relies on the support of generous readers like you. Donate today to keep our climate news free.

GM: Dingell’s raising the old canard that Americans won’t stand for a new energy tax. What the debate over the [Bill] Clinton BTU tax taught us was that Americans won’t stand for an unfocused and poorly motivated tax with lots of loopholes for special interests.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

I think the lesson from the BTU tax is that first you need to motivate the tax with a clear and simple rationale. The need to do something about global warming is no longer under debate in the U.S. and provides that rationale. Second, you need to create a package that is revenue neutral. My GETS proposal is both distributionally and revenue neutral. There’s no reason Congress can’t dedicate the carbon tax revenue to a special fund that is earmarked for income or payroll tax reductions.

Read the whole thing.

Here’s Al Gore trying to sell it:

(thanks LL!)

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.