Skip to content
Grist home
Grist home
Grist home
  • Let’s raze more Amazon rainforest!

    Blairo Maggi is a powerful man in Brazil. He owns a company called Grupo Andre Maggi that runs vast soybean plantations in the state of Matto Grasso, which straddles the Amazon rainforest and what the Nature Conservancy calls “the world’s most biologically rich savanna.” The New York Times has called Maggi “the largest soybean grower […]

  • Snippets from the news

    • Washington, D.C., kickstarts bike-sharing program. • Tentative deal reached on farm bill. • Are hybrids unhealthy? • Gov. Schwarzenegger pushes for a power line through a state park. • Canada’s environment minister proposes limits on VOCs. • Russia says “nyet” to mandatory carbon caps.

  • U.S. should back off from biofuels to bring down food prices, says Texas guv

    Has the U.S. push for biofuels contributed to rising global food prices? Well, yes, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Monday: “There has been apparently some effect, unintended consequence from the alternative fuels effort.” But, she hastened to add, “biofuels continue to be an extremely important piece of the alternative energy picture” and “we think […]

  • Video of Radiohead’s green performance on Conan

    Rather than take a transatlantic flight (the carbon footprint equivalent of driving for a whole year), Radiohead recorded a live performance in London for their “appearance” on Late Night with Conan O’Brien last week. They played “House of Cards,” a song with the refrain “denial, denial” — and dedicated it to “that twat who walked […]

  • The only obstacle to more state carbon taxes is politics

    One of Washington State's conservative think tanks has just proposed a carbon tax shift. Interesting. (Read it here.)

    The Washington Policy Center has garbed its tax shift proposal in anti-government clothing. Some of the rhetoric makes my skin crawl.

    But the proposal itself is sensible if modest. It includes a starter carbon tax that pays for a small sales tax reduction. As a bonus, it throws in a business and occupations tax reduction on all capital investment. It's not goofy. It's the kind of thing I was hoping we might get about a decade ago, when energy and climate issues weren't front-page news.

    Today, I hope we can do better: a comprehensive, auctioned, regional cap-and-trade system with built-in buffers for working families.

    I'm guessing that the political chances of WPC's proposal are somewhat slimmer than the odds for my preferred climate pricing policy. So rather than engage in a fight over the rhetoric, I'll use it as a springboard to answering four questions that I've had from readers and from people at my speeches on climate policy.

  • Ousted L.A. gardeners continue to farm

    In June 2006, a land dispute led to the shutdown of the South Central Community Garden in Los Angeles. Weeks of protest and tree-sitting by celebrities and regular folk proved unfruitful, and the 14-acre garden, tended by 350 low-income families in the middle of one of L.A.’s poorest neighborhoods, was bulldozed. Nearly two years later, […]

  • The cost of the status quo

    We keep being told how much it will cost us to leave fossil fuels behind. Here’s a little story about how much it will cost us to remain hooked: “According to normal economic theory, and the history of oil, rising prices have two major effects,” said Fatih Birol, the chief economist at the International Energy […]

  • An interview with The ‘Stache pre-pie-in-the-face

    Yes, Tom Friedman came to Brown University on Earth Day to unveil his new book and got hit by a pie.

    Thomas FriedmanBut he cleaned himself up, came back with a joke about surviving Beirut and Jerusalem but running into trouble in Providence, and went on to deliver a stem-winder of an address for an op-ed columnist essentially outlining his latest book.

    I found The World Is Flat to be a good window into business models in the 21st century. His new offering, Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution -- and How It Can Renew America, promises to be a cogent lassoing and explication of many of the biggest things that matter in the 21st century. Friedman chooses as the crucial drivers: energy supply and demand, climate, the spread of democracy versus petro-authoritarianism, biodiversity, and energy poverty.

    A few bits from Friedman's speech to look forward to in Hot, Flat, and Crowded and when he returns to columns this month:

    • The McCain gas tax holiday: A "dumb as we want to be" approach to energy policy.
    • On high oil prices and petro-dictatorship: With oil at $25 per barrel, Bush looked into Putin's eyes and saw his soul. At $100 per barrel, look into Putin's eyes and you'll see "all the instruments of democracy he's swallowed."
    • Did Reagan bring down the USSR -- or was it the decline in oil prices from $80 per barrel to $14.50?
    • And finally, China as the Speed bus, except that it must switch from a diesel to a hybrid engine without going below 50 miles an hour. (That's the first thing since The Matrix that makes you aspire to be Keanu Reeves, isn't it?)

    Before his speech, I had the chance to catch up with Friedman and ask him a few questions. The short interview is below:

  • Easing off the gas eases gas use

    A few weeks ago, Clark wrote about truck drivers slowing down to economize on fuel. It's a great story, but was it a real trend or just anecdotal?

    The Slow Car movement. Photo: pietroizzo via Flickr

    Well, I'm here to report that there's some truth to it. Or at least some truthiness. A recent Congressional Budget Office paper examining the effects of gas prices found this: "Freeway motorists have adjusted to higher prices by making fewer trips and driving more slowly."

    That's surprising to me. I mean, I don't slow down when gas prices are high; it would never occur to me. Do other folks?

  • A gap between rich and poor makes free markets fail

    It's really an absurd travesty when starvation gets blamed on "global warming do-gooders," and we haven't seen the last of that. The problem is miscast, though. There isn't a food shortage, at least not yet. There is a food price crisis, which is a very different beast.

    Are its roots in the huge resource gap between the relatively rich and the very poor? If that's true, it has broad implications.

    Here's one way of looking at it, from the Omaha World-Herald: