Scientists say climate change is happening and that we’re exacerbating it. Don’t believe me? Check out this beautifully simple pie chart* that illustrates just how rare climate denial in the scientific community is:

That’s right. Only one — ONE — of the 9,137 authors of peer-reviewed climate change articles rejected anthropogenic global warming. Geochemist James Powell did the research on publications from November 2012 and December 2013. (But if a year-long sample isn’t good enough for you, Powell previously examined 21 years of peer-reviewed literature and found that only 24 out of 13,950 articles — or two-tenths of a percent — came out and rejected human-caused climate change.)

Reader support helps sustain our work. Donate today to keep our climate news free. All donations matched.

The lone dissident, S. V. Avakyan, wrote in Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, “The contribution of the greenhouse effect of carbon-containing gases to global warming turns out to be insignificant.” But Coby Beck smacks this idea down in his “How to talk to a climate skeptic” series. Plus, Avakyan clearly admits his bias on the very first page of his article:

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

The switch of world powers first to decreasing the use of fossil fuel … may lead to economic collapse for Russia …

That’s why you invest in solar, ding-a-ling!

We’ll let Powell have the eloquent last word:

The scientific literature since 1991 contains a mountain of evidence confirming [hu]man-made global warming as true and no convincing evidence that it is false. Global warming denial is a house of cards.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Update: The number of peer-reviewed climate articles on the chart has been updated from 2,258 to 2,259.