Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

Keep on Truckin'

Truckers slowing down to increase fuel efficiency

Posted at 1:06 PM on 24 Mar 2008

Truck.
You think filling up your car is a pain in the wallet? Try being a trucker. Most big rigs get less than 10 miles to the gallon, and diesel fuel is hovering near $4 a gallon in many places. "For every one-penny increase in the price of diesel, it costs our industry $391 million," says a trucking industry spokesperson. In response, many trucking companies are instructing their drivers to ease off the throttle. Slowing from 75 miles per hour to 65 mph can increase fuel efficiency by more than a mile per gallon. And along with burning less fuel, slowed-down trucks make highways safer for the rest of us.

sources:  Associated Press, Dayton Daily News, The Kansas City Star
see also, in Grist:  Electrified truck stops let tired drivers turn off their diesel engines

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (4 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Illegitimate Industry

Transporting goods by train instead of truck would save a lot of oil and significantly reduce pollution.  Unfortunately, the U.S. is a business-run society, and business wants its stuff now!  Even though the vast majority of this stuff is totally unnecessary and the consumption of it is destroying the Earth.

The sheer number of trucks on the road is appalling.  (So is the number of cars, but that's not the issue here.)  Something needs to be done to greatly reduce that number.  Merely improving the fuel mileage of vehicles that are needlessly consuming oil and polluting will only slightly lessen the problems they cause and will not approach solving them.

Train vs. truck...

I dunno...trains are even less fuel efficient than trucks, in terms of MPG for diseal fuel.

What's the average fuel efficiency per container on a truck versus a train?

And even if it is better, more container trains means more trouble for Amtrak and other passenger trains, who often haveta share the lines, and though the government requires the container lines to give way to passenger trains, it hardly ever happens.

It's responsible for the vast majority of the time delays by Amtrak.

Passenger v. Freight Trains

You're correct that in the U.S., freight trains cause massive delays of passenger trains.  But the problem is not freight trains, it's the fact that selfish Americans won't pay taxes in order to build a decent rail system, like the ones in western Europe and Japan.  Freight and passenger trains should be on separate tracks, and the fact that they have to share tracks is the problem.

Re fuel efficiency, there's no comparison between trucks and trains.  While a train engine uses more fuel than a truck engine, a train can be over 100 cars long.  Trains are far more efficient than trucks.

Of course, the fundamental problems here, as elsewhere, are overconsumption and overpopulation.  Eliminate these problems and there wouldn't be anywhere near as many trucks OR freight trains.

Highway speeds

Remember the "double nickle"?  The national speed limit during the early '70's.

Slowing down from 75 to 65 is a start, but 55 is even better.  How about a national speed limit for trucks AND cars of 55 mph?  

With 55 the ENFORCED law, highways last longer, less air pollution, and perhaps consumers will no longer value "performance" over fuel economy.  Besides, with wireless connectivity and DVDs, there's no reason to blast at 75+.  Might save a few more lives as well.

Bring back the Double Nickle!

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks