They’re building a huge new coal-fired power plant in Holz, Germany, where there are already three.

To fuel it, an open-pit mine that has scarred the fields outside town with a 31-square-mile hole will be moved west, swallowing up this village and nearby Pesch. Already, their neat cottages sit empty and boarded.

That’s just one of many planned for Europe:

Grist relies on the support of generous readers like you. Donate today to keep our climate news free. All donations matched!

Plans are on the books to build 40 major coal-fired power stations across Europe in the next five years. Germany, which, like Spain, Italy and others, is swearing off nuclear power, plans to build 27 coal-fired stations by 2020. … Over the next decade, new, mainly coal power plants in Europe could add 700 million tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere every year, according to the U.S.-based Center for Global Development — a 39 percent increase.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

But don’t worry, the math works out:

Power companies say the new high-efficiency plants under construction ultimately could reduce overall emissions by burning less coal than their predecessors.

It’s like I had a cousin with really bad flatulence, but then I got a new cousin whose flatulence wasn’t as bad, and suddenly everything smelled like roses!

Oh, and just as Gar bait, note this little bit buried deep in the story:

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

To offset these new emissions, RWE is investing heavily in alternative energy in Germany. It is also taking advantage of a provision of the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, which allows the company to invest in greenhouse-gas-reduction projects in developing countries. The utility is installing a catalytic converter to filter emissions at a fertilizer plant in Egypt and is funding a project to control methane gas in China at a cost far less than what it would pay to achieve a similar reduction in Germany.

Everything rides on the word “similar,” no?