Been wondering what’s up with Theda Skocpol’s climate-bill report you’ve been hearing about? Here’s the deal: Skocpol, a Harvard professor of government and sociology, was commissioned by the Rockefeller Family Fund to write a report analyzing what went wrong during the unsuccessful 2009-10 push to pass climate legislation. The resulting 145-page opus — “Naming the Problem: What It Will Take to Counter Extremism and Engage Americans in the Fight Against Global Warming” [PDF] — has kicked up a lot of controversy, and you can read all about it here at Grist:

• A summary of the report by Philip Bump: Why the environmental movement couldn’t get cap-and-trade passed

• A three-part response from Grist’s David Roberts:
1) What Theda Skocpol gets right about the cap-and-trade fight
2) The road forward from cap-and-trade
3) If you want to pass climate legislation, fix U.S. politics

Grist relies on the support of generous readers like you to keep our climate news free. All donations matched for a limited time.

• A response 350.org activist and author (and Grist board member) Bill McKibben: Beyond baby steps: Analyzing the cap-and-trade flop

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

• A response from author and Environmental Defense Fund VP Eric Pooley: Why the climate bill failed: It’s not that simple

• A response from Climate Progress blogger Joe Romm: The problem wasn’t the green groups: What Skocpol gets wrong about the climate bill fight

• A response from activist and author Mark Hertsgaard: Missing the point of the cap-and-trade defeat

• A response from climate organizer Mike Tidwell: Harvard professor has it right: U.S. climate push requires intense grassroots support around ‘cap-and-dividend’ bill

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

• And, finally, a follow-up piece from Skocpol herself: Learning from the cap-and-trade debate

(Skocpol also weighed in with comments under some of the above posts.)

Haven’t gotten enough yet? Stay tuned — there might be still more …