It’s Wednesday, August 24, and two climate lawsuits are moving forward in state courts.

A federal appeals court ruled last week that two climate lawsuits should be heard in state courts, rather than federal ones — rejecting the fossil fuel industry’s efforts to forestall hearings on the cases’ merits.

The lawsuits, filed in 2020 by Hoboken, New Jersey, and the state of Delaware, invoked state-level tort law to claim the plaintiffs have been harmed by the fossil fuel industry, whose production of coal, oil, and gas has exacerbated climate change. Lawyers for both jurisdictions alleged that more than a dozen oil and gas companies knew the risks of climate change but worked to deceive the public about them.

The fossil fuel companies wanted to move Hoboken and Delaware’s lawsuits to federal court, arguing that they involved federal issues like oil exploration. Karen Sokol, an associate professor at the Loyola University College of Law, said these requests likely reflect the industry’s desire to avoid state-level consumer protection laws or to stir up a jurisdictional battle to delay the suits’ progress.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Grist relies on the support of generous readers like you. Donate today to keep our climate news free. All donations matched!

”I believe they’re very, very alarmed about the prospect of discovery,” she told me. Allowing the cases to proceed in state courts could potentially uncover incriminating documents about the industry’s decades-long disinformation campaign.

However, the industry’s strategy hasn’t worked. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision to remand Hoboken and Delaware’s lawsuits last week was the fifth time a federal court has rejected the fossil fuel industry’s requests for their cases to be heard in federal court. Defendants from the fossil fuel industry “may prefer federal court,” Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote in the court’s opinion, “but they may not remove their cases to federal court unless federal laws let them. Here, they do not.”

Officials in Hoboken — which is seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation for climate-related resilience projects, as well as damages from Hurricane Sandy in 2012 — celebrated the decision. Marilyn Baer, Hoboken’s communications manager, said in a statement that the city is excited for the lawsuit to be heard “as originally intended.”

“Hoboken has had to fortify itself against the damaging effects of climate change exacerbated by the fossil fuel industry and its misinformation campaign,” she said. “We look forward to the day when these companies are held accountable for their actions.”

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

In the news

As many as 1 in 6 US tree species is threatened with extinction
Sarah Kaplan, The Washington Post
Read more

Europe facing its worst drought in 500 years — study
Philip Blenkinsop, Reuters
Read more

China hit by longest and strongest heatwave on record
Joe Lo, Climate Home News
Read more

3 states tell FERC: Western gas project violates climate laws
Jason Plautz, E&E News
Read more

France mulls regulations on private jets
Ivana Saric, Axios
Read more

People doubt their actions affect climate change. Is that a bad thing?
Kate Yoder, Grist
Read more